Vivo TWS 5 VS Vivo TWS Air 3

The Vivo TWS 5 and Vivo TWS Air 3 both feature an IP54 rating, indicating they are both sweat resistant and protected from dust and water splashes, making them suitable for active use. However, the TWS 5 is slightly heavier at 9.6 g compared to the 7.2 g weight of the TWS Air 3, which may be noticeable for users prioritizing lighter earbuds.

In terms of fit, the TWS 5 uses an in-ear design, while the TWS Air 3 employs an earbud fit. Neither model includes wingtips, and neither has RGB lighting or UV light features. Both models are wireless, with no neckband included, and both are equipped with stereo speakers for a fuller sound experience. Additionally, neither of these models offers a display.

Overall, both products share several common features such as sweat resistance and stereo sound, but the TWS 5 offers an in-ear fit and a slightly heavier build, whereas the TWS Air 3 opts for a lighter, earbud design.

The Vivo TWS 5 features active noise cancellation (ANC), while the Vivo TWS Air 3 does not, making the TWS 5 better equipped for blocking out external noise. The TWS 5 also has passive noise reduction, whereas the TWS Air 3 lacks this feature entirely. In terms of driver unit size, the TWS 5 has an 11 mm driver, while the TWS Air 3 is equipped with a slightly larger 12 mm driver, which may result in a difference in sound output, though both are capable of producing frequencies from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz.

Both models support spatial audio, enhancing the immersive listening experience, though neither supports Dolby Atmos or Dirac Virtuo, and neither has a neodymium magnet for additional sound enhancement.

Overall, the key difference in sound quality between the two lies in the TWS 5’s active noise cancellation and passive noise reduction features, while the TWS Air 3 boasts a larger driver unit size.

The Vivo TWS 5 offers a battery life of 12 hours on a single charge, while the Vivo TWS Air 3 provides 10 hours. Both have a battery life of 36 hours when using the charging case, with a 2-hour charge time for both models. Neither product supports wireless charging or solar power, and both feature a rechargeable battery and a battery level indicator to keep track of remaining power.

In terms of battery performance, the TWS 5 provides slightly longer usage time compared to the TWS Air 3, but both offer similar overall battery life when including the charging case.

Overall, the primary difference between the two products in this category is the TWS 5’s longer battery life per charge, while both share similar capabilities with charging time, case battery life, and additional features.

Both the Vivo TWS 5 and Vivo TWS Air 3 feature USB Type-C for charging, ensuring fast and convenient connections. However, the Vivo TWS 5 uses Bluetooth version 5.4, while the Vivo TWS Air 3 uses the newer Bluetooth version 6, which may offer enhanced connectivity and performance.

In terms of audio codecs, the TWS 5 supports LDAC, LDHC, and AAC, providing a variety of options for high-quality audio streaming. The TWS Air 3, on the other hand, only lacks LDAC and LDHC and does not support AAC, limiting its codec compatibility.

When it comes to audio latency, the TWS Air 3 offers a lower latency of 33 ms compared to the TWS 5's 44 ms, which may benefit users seeking reduced delay for activities like gaming or video watching. Both products share the same maximum Bluetooth range of 10 meters, and neither supports Bluetooth pairing via NFC or has features like AptX or Auracast.

Both the Vivo TWS 5 and Vivo TWS Air 3 support fast charging, allowing for quick recharges. They also both include a travel bag for convenience, and both models have voice prompts to assist users with notifications and status updates. Additionally, neither model can read notifications, nor do they have a built-in translator, in-line control panels, temperature sensors, or built-in camera remote control functions.

One key difference between the two is that the Vivo TWS 5 includes an ambient sound mode, which allows users to hear surrounding sounds while using the earbuds, while the TWS Air 3 does not have this feature. Both models have a mute function and can be used as a headset, with their control panels placed on a device.

Overall, the TWS 5 offers an additional feature with its ambient sound mode, while both models share many core functionalities, such as fast charging, voice prompts, and travel bag inclusion.

Both the Vivo TWS 5 and Vivo TWS Air 3 come with noise-canceling microphones. This feature helps reduce background noise during calls or recordings, ensuring clearer communication.

There is no difference between the two products in terms of microphone capabilities, as both are equipped with this noise-canceling feature.

Overall, both models provide the same microphone functionality, making them equally suitable for users who need effective noise reduction during voice calls or audio capture.