Vivo V50 VS Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

Both phones are waterproof and share the same core build philosophy — no rugged construction, no folding form factor — but the details reveal meaningful differences. The Vivo V50 is notably slimmer at 7.6 mm thick versus the Poco X7 Pro's 8.3 mm, and despite being taller and wider, it occupies less total volume (95.19 cm³ vs 100.36 cm³). In practical terms, the V50 will feel sleeker and more pocketable, while the X7 Pro's slightly more compact footprint in height and width may feel more manageable in one hand.

The most significant differentiator in this group is the water resistance rating. The V50 carries an IP69 certification, while the X7 Pro is rated IP68. Both protect against sustained submersion, but IP69 adds resistance to high-pressure, high-temperature water jets — a real-world edge for those who might rinse a phone under a forceful tap or use it in harsher wet conditions. For everyday splashes and rain, both are equally capable, but IP69 is the objectively higher standard.

Overall, the Vivo V50 holds a clear advantage in this category: it is lighter by 4 g, slimmer by 0.7 mm, more compact by volume, and carries the superior water resistance certification. Users who prioritize a slim, refined feel and stronger protection against water exposure will find the V50 the better-engineered option here.

Both the Vivo V50 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Vivo V50 has a screen size of 6.77″, which is slightly larger than the 6.67″ screen on the Poco X7 Pro. The Vivo V50 also has a pixel density of 388 ppi, while the Poco X7 Pro has a higher pixel density of 446 ppi, making the Poco's display sharper in terms of detail.

When it comes to resolution, the Vivo V50 has a resolution of 1080 x 2392 px, while the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro has a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 px, offering a crisper and more detailed image. Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, which ensures smooth scrolling and gaming experiences. The Vivo V50 offers a typical brightness of 1300 nits, slightly lower than the 1400 nits of the Poco X7 Pro, giving the latter a slight edge in bright environments.

Both phones support HDR10 and HDR10+ for enhanced color and contrast in compatible content. The Vivo V50 supports Always-On Display, and the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro does as well. The Vivo V50 does not feature branded damage-resistant glass, while the Poco X7 Pro includes it. Additionally, the Poco X7 Pro supports Dolby Vision, which the Vivo V50 does not. Neither device has a secondary screen, and both are touch-screen enabled.

Both the Vivo V50 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro come with 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, providing ample space and memory for most users. The Vivo V50 features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset with a CPU clocked at 1 x 2.63 GHz, 3 x 2.4 GHz, and 4 x 1.8 GHz. In contrast, the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro uses the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 chipset with a faster CPU speed of 1 x 3.25 GHz, 3 x 3.0 GHz, and 4 x 2.15 GHz, which may result in better performance in tasks that require higher clock speeds.

The Vivo V50 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 866,863, while the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro achieves a significantly higher score of 1,663,422, indicating the Poco X7 Pro offers superior overall performance based on this test. Additionally, the Poco X7 Pro’s GPU, the Mali G720 MC7, has a higher clock speed of 1300 MHz compared to the Vivo V50's Adreno 720 at 950 MHz, suggesting the Poco X7 Pro may provide better graphics performance for gaming and other GPU-intensive tasks.

RAM speeds also differ between the two models: the Vivo V50 features a RAM speed of 3200 MHz, while the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro offers faster RAM at 4267 MHz. This could lead to quicker data processing and better multitasking performance on the Poco X7 Pro. The Vivo V50 has a maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, while the Poco X7 Pro has a much higher memory bandwidth of 68.2 GB/s, further contributing to the Poco's superior performance. Both devices support 64-bit processing, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and have integrated graphics. Both phones also use big.LITTLE technology, have 8 CPU threads, and include TrustZone security features. However, the Vivo V50 is limited to a maximum memory capacity of 16GB, while the Poco X7 Pro can support up to 24GB of RAM.

The Vivo V50 features a dual-lens main camera with 50 MP + 50 MP sensors, offering a wide aperture of f/2 and f/1.9. In comparison, the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro has a dual-lens main camera with 50 MP + 8 MP sensors and a slightly narrower aperture of f/2.2 and f/1.5. Both phones support phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during video recording, and slow-motion video, but the Poco X7 Pro stands out by offering video recording at 2160 x 60 fps, compared to the Vivo V50’s 2160 x 30 fps. Both devices have CMOS sensors, though neither offers a BSI sensor. Additionally, the Vivo V50 lacks built-in optical image stabilization (OIS), while the Poco X7 Pro includes it.

For front cameras, the Vivo V50 has a 50 MP front sensor with a wide aperture of f/2, while the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro features a 20 MP front sensor with a slightly narrower f/2.5 aperture. Both devices support features like manual exposure, touch autofocus, panorama shots, and timelapse functions. However, the Vivo V50 lacks features such as HDR10 recording and a front-facing LED flash, which the Poco X7 Pro supports. The Poco X7 Pro also has raw photo shooting capability, which is not available on the Vivo V50.

Both phones can create panoramas in-camera, support manual ISO and white balance, and have serial shot mode. Neither device supports HDR10 recording or Dolby Vision recording, except for the Poco X7 Pro, which supports HDR10 recording. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash or RGB LED flash. Additionally, both phones lack a 360° panorama feature and 3D photo/video capabilities.

Both the Vivo V50 and the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro run Android 15, offering similar features related to privacy, customization, and user control. Both devices support clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. They also both have on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media pickers, and the ability to play games while downloading. Furthermore, both phones feature dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing, battery health check, and an extra dim mode.

There are some common features in both models, such as the ability to offload apps, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture). Both devices also support widgets, have offline voice recognition, voice commands, and track the current position of the device. Additionally, both are multi-user systems and offer a child lock, but neither phone offers Quick Start, and neither can be used as a PC.

One notable area where the two devices are identical is in their privacy features: both lack Mail Privacy Protection, and neither blocks cross-site tracking. Both devices also share the same limitations in terms of getting direct OS updates, as neither supports them. Overall, the software experience appears to be nearly identical on both the Vivo V50 and the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro, with only a few minor distinctions, none of which significantly set the two apart in this category.

Both the Vivo V50 and the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro come equipped with a 6000 mAh battery, offering ample power for extended usage. Neither phone supports wireless charging, but both support fast charging at 90W, ensuring quick power-ups. Both devices come with a charger in the box, and neither has a removable battery, making them similar in terms of battery setup. Additionally, both phones feature a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily track battery status.

Both the Vivo V50 and the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro are equipped with rechargeable batteries, providing long-term usability. There are no significant differences in the battery features between the two phones, as both offer the same charging speed, battery power, and lack wireless charging support.

Overall, the battery specifications of the Vivo V50 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro are identical, providing users with comparable battery performance and charging capabilities.

Both the Vivo V50 and the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro lack a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users must rely on wireless audio solutions or adapters for wired headphones. Both phones are equipped with stereo speakers, ensuring a more immersive audio experience compared to mono sound. In terms of wireless audio, the Vivo V50 does not support aptX, LDAC, or any of the aptX variants, while the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro supports aptX, LDAC, and aptX HD, providing higher quality audio streaming over Bluetooth.

Neither device has a built-in radio, so users looking for FM radio support will need to look elsewhere. The Vivo V50 does not support aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless, whereas the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro does support aptX HD, but not aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless.

Overall, while both devices offer stereo speakers and similar basic audio features, the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro offers more advanced Bluetooth audio capabilities with aptX and LDAC support, which may appeal to users who prioritize high-quality wireless audio.

Both the Vivo V50 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile network speeds. In terms of Wi-Fi support, the Vivo V50 supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), while the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro adds Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) support, which offers better efficiency and performance in crowded networks. Both phones use Bluetooth version 5.4 (Vivo V50) and 6 (Poco X7 Pro), with the Poco X7 Pro having the advantage of a slightly newer version for potentially improved Bluetooth performance.

When it comes to NFC, the Vivo V50 lacks this feature, whereas the Poco X7 Pro includes it. Both phones come with a USB Type-C port and USB version 2, and both support the same cellular network capabilities, GPS, and compass. Additionally, both devices have a gyroscope, accelerometer, and support Galileo, but neither includes a barometer, HDMI output, or a built-in projector.

Additional connectivity features differ slightly between the two: the Vivo V50 lacks an infrared sensor, whereas the Poco X7 Pro includes one. Both devices have a fingerprint scanner, but neither phone supports emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or DLNA certification. Neither phone has motion or optical tracking, and both devices lack 3D facial recognition, iris scanners, or a stylus. The Poco X7 Pro does have an infrared sensor, which the Vivo V50 does not.

Both the Vivo V50 and the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro feature a video light, allowing users to improve lighting in videos and photos. Neither phone includes sapphire glass display protection, a curved display, or an e-paper display. These specifications are identical across both devices, meaning there are no differences in these features between the two models.

Overall, the Vivo V50 and Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro offer similar capabilities in the miscellaneous category, with both having a video light and lacking additional advanced display features like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.