Vivo V60e VS Xiaomi Poco F7

Both the Vivo V60e and the Xiaomi Poco F7 are waterproof devices with an IP68 rating, ensuring they can withstand exposure to water, though neither has a rugged build. In terms of size and weight, the Vivo V60e is slightly lighter, weighing 190 g compared to the Poco F7's 215.7 g. The V60e is also a bit thinner, with a thickness of 7.5 mm, while the Poco F7 is thicker at 8.2 mm.

When it comes to dimensions, the two devices are quite similar. The Vivo V60e has a width of 77 mm and a height of 163.5 mm, while the Poco F7 has a width of 77.9 mm and a height of 163.1 mm. These small differences make the V60e slightly narrower and taller, but the overall size comparison is minor.

In terms of volume, the Vivo V60e has a smaller form factor, measuring 94.42 cm³, compared to the Poco F7's 104.19 cm³, making the Poco F7 slightly bulkier overall.

Both the Vivo V60e and the Xiaomi Poco F7 feature OLED/AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth visuals. The V60e's screen measures 6.77 inches, while the Poco F7 has a slightly larger 6.83-inch display. In terms of resolution, the V60e offers 1080 x 2392 px, while the Poco F7 has a higher resolution of 1280 x 2772 px, providing more pixels overall.

The pixel density also differs, with the Vivo V60e having 388 ppi compared to the Poco F7's higher 447 ppi, meaning the Poco F7’s display will be slightly sharper. Brightness is another area where the two diverge, with the V60e supporting a peak brightness of 1600 nits, much brighter than the Poco F7's 700 nits.

Both devices support HDR10 and HDR10+, with the Vivo V60e lacking Dolby Vision support, while the Poco F7 includes Dolby Vision, enhancing its display experience. Both phones also have branded damage-resistant glass and touchscreen functionality, and neither features a secondary screen.

The Vivo V60e and Xiaomi Poco F7 both come with 12GB of RAM, but they differ in other key performance aspects. The Vivo V60e features a MediaTek Dimensity 7360 chipset, while the Poco F7 uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. The V60e's chipset is paired with a Mali G615 MC2 GPU, while the Poco F7 has an Adreno 825 GPU, each offering distinct graphics processing capabilities.

In terms of CPU, the Vivo V60e has a combination of 4 x 2.5 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz cores, totaling 8 threads, while the Poco F7 has a more complex setup with 3 x 3.01 GHz, 2 x 2.8 GHz, 2 x 2.02 GHz, and 1 x 3.21 GHz cores, also with 8 threads. The Vivo V60e’s CPU clock speed is 2.5 GHz, while the Poco F7’s highest clock speed is 3.21 GHz, indicating a higher peak performance for the Poco F7’s processor.

The V60e supports a RAM speed of 6400 MHz, compared to the Poco F7’s 4800 MHz. Despite this difference in RAM speed, both phones have a semiconductor size of 4 nm and support 64-bit processing. The Vivo V60e also has a maximum memory amount of 16GB, while the Poco F7 supports up to 24GB of RAM, providing more future-proof memory expansion. Both phones also support DirectX 12 and have integrated graphics, and neither device supports multiple displays.

The Vivo V60e and Xiaomi Poco F7 both feature dual-lens main cameras, but with different configurations. The Vivo V60e offers a 200 MP and 8 MP setup with wide apertures of f/2.2 and f/1.9, while the Poco F7 has a 50 MP and 8 MP main camera with f/2.2 and f/1.5 apertures. Both devices offer a 50 MP front camera on the Vivo V60e and a 20 MP front camera on the Poco F7, with wide apertures of f/2.0 and f/2.2 respectively.

Both phones have optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus, and support for slow-motion video recording, along with a built-in HDR mode. They both also feature manual exposure, manual ISO, serial shot mode, and manual focus for flexibility in photography. Additionally, they can create panoramas in-camera and support timelapse functionality. The Vivo V60e has a single LED flash with one LED, while the Poco F7 uses a dual-tone LED flash with two LEDs.

Neither phone supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both lack a front-facing LED flash, a dual-lens front camera, or 3D photo/video capabilities. Both phones also have a CMOS sensor, continuous autofocus for video, and touch autofocus. The Vivo V60e has a BSI sensor, while the Poco F7 does not.

Both the Vivo V60e and Xiaomi Poco F7 run Android 15 and share a similar range of features. Both phones have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy controls. They also allow for theme customization, blocking app tracking, on-device machine learning, and customizable notifications. Both phones support dark mode, media picker, full-page screenshots, and split-screen functionality. Additionally, both devices have the ability to play games while they download and include features like Live Text, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and offline voice recognition.

There are a few differences between the two. The Vivo V60e does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, while the Poco F7 does. Similarly, the Vivo V60e lacks Wi-Fi password sharing, but the Poco F7 has this feature. Both phones have a battery health check, extra dim mode, and dynamic theming, but neither has focus modes or Quick Start.

Both phones allow for app offloading, support widgets, have voice commands, and track the current position of the device. Neither phone supports direct OS updates, nor do they have a PC mode. Both are free and open source, and both are multi-user systems with a child lock and sharing intents. The Vivo V60e also supports manual control of some features such as shutter speed and ISO.

The Vivo V60e and Xiaomi Poco F7 are identical in terms of battery specifications. Both feature a 6500 mAh battery and support fast charging at a speed of 90W. Neither device offers wireless charging, nor do they have removable batteries. Both phones also have a battery level indicator and rechargeable batteries.

Overall, both devices are quite similar in battery capabilities, with no significant differences between them in this area.

Both the Vivo V60e and Xiaomi Poco F7 feature stereo speakers, providing enhanced audio output. Neither device has a 3.5 mm audio jack socket, meaning you'll need wireless or USB-C audio solutions. When it comes to audio codec support, the Vivo V60e lacks support for aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. In contrast, the Poco F7 supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, but like the Vivo V60e, it does not support aptX Lossless.

Neither phone includes a radio, so they rely entirely on digital media for audio content.

Both the Vivo V60e and Xiaomi Poco F7 support 5G and feature similar connectivity options, including dual SIM cards and USB Type-C (USB 2.0) ports. They both support NFC and have fingerprint scanners for security. In terms of wireless connectivity, the Vivo V60e supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), while the Poco F7 offers a more advanced range, supporting Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and even Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), giving it an edge in terms of future-proof Wi-Fi support.

In terms of Bluetooth, the Vivo V60e uses Bluetooth 5.4, while the Poco F7 supports the newer Bluetooth 6. Both devices include a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, an infrared sensor, and an accelerometer, and both have a cellular module, but neither has a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. They also lack a built-in projector, motion tracking, or optical tracking.

Both phones support Galileo for satellite positioning, and neither includes an external memory slot, heart rate monitor, or a stylus. They both also lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, and customizable features like a built-in projector.

Both the Vivo V60e and Xiaomi Poco F7 feature a video light, which can be useful for improving lighting in videos. Neither phone has sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays. The specifications in this group are identical for both devices, with no differences in these features.