vivo X200 Ultra VS Vivo X300 Pro

Both the vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro feature waterproof designs, with an Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP69, meaning they are resistant to dust and can withstand high-pressure water jets. The two phones are quite similar in physical dimensions, though the X200 Ultra is slightly heavier at 229 g compared to the X300 Pro’s 226 g. Additionally, the X200 Ultra is a bit thicker at 8.7 mm, whereas the X300 Pro measures 8 mm in thickness.

When it comes to width, the X200 Ultra is marginally wider at 76.8 mm, while the X300 Pro is 75.5 mm. The X200 Ultra is also taller, with a height of 163.1 mm, compared to the X300 Pro’s 161.2 mm. In terms of volume, the X200 Ultra has a larger body, with a volume of 108.98 cm³, while the X300 Pro’s volume is 97.36 cm³.

Neither phone has a rugged build or the ability to fold, so they are designed primarily for regular use rather than extreme durability or flexibility.

Both the vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The X200 Ultra has a slightly larger screen size at 6.82″ compared to the X300 Pro’s 6.78″. The pixel density of the X200 Ultra is higher, at 510 ppi, while the X300 Pro has 452 ppi, meaning the X200 Ultra’s display offers more pixels per inch for potentially sharper details.

In terms of resolution, the X200 Ultra has a higher count, with a 1440 x 3168 px display, compared to the X300 Pro’s 1260 x 2800 px. Both devices share the same 120Hz refresh rate and 300Hz touch sampling rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and responsive touch input.

Both phones are equipped with branded damage-resistant glass, support HDR10 and HDR10+, feature an Always-On Display, and support Dolby Vision, ensuring an enhanced visual experience with high dynamic range content. The contrast ratio is identical on both devices, rated at 8000000:1. Neither device includes a secondary screen, and both feature a touch screen.

Both the vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro come with 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, providing ample space and memory for demanding tasks. In terms of AnTuTu benchmark scores, the X200 Ultra scores 2,819,127, while the X300 Pro performs slightly better with a score of 3,015,900.

The X200 Ultra is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset with a CPU configuration of 2 x 4.32 GHz and 6 x 3.53 GHz cores. On the other hand, the X300 Pro uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, with a CPU that includes 1 x 4.21 GHz, 3 x 3.5 GHz, and 4 x 2.7 GHz cores. The X200 Ultra's GPU is the Adreno 830, with a clock speed of 1100 MHz, while the X300 Pro features the Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU with a faster clock speed of 1750 MHz.

Both devices have integrated LTE, support 64-bit processing, and feature HMP (heterogeneous multi-processing) with 8 CPU threads. RAM speeds are slightly different, with the X200 Ultra running at 5300 MHz and the X300 Pro at 5333 MHz. Both phones utilize the same 3 nm semiconductor size, DDR5 memory, and OpenCL version 3. Maximum memory bandwidth is nearly identical, with the X200 Ultra offering 85.1 GB/s and the X300 Pro slightly ahead at 85.3 GB/s. The X200 Ultra has 1536 shading units, compared to the X300 Pro’s 128. The X200 Ultra also features an 8 MB L3 cache, while the X300 Pro has a larger 16 MB L3 cache. Both phones support multithreading and have integrated graphics.

Both the vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro feature impressive triple-lens main cameras, each with 200 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP sensors. However, their aperture sizes slightly differ. The X200 Ultra has a 2.3f, 1.7f, and 2f aperture setup, while the X300 Pro has 2.7f, 1.6f, and 2f apertures. Both phones offer a 50 MP front camera, with the X200 Ultra having a wider 2.5f aperture compared to the X300 Pro's 2f aperture. Both devices have optical image stabilization (OIS) and can record video at 4320 x 30 fps with phase-detection autofocus (PDAF) for photos and continuous autofocus for video.

In terms of additional features, the X200 Ultra offers more advanced options, such as 360° panorama shooting, HDR10 and Dolby Vision recording, and the ability to shoot 3D photo/video. The X300 Pro, on the other hand, lacks 360° panorama and 3D recording capabilities, as well as HDR10 and Dolby Vision recording. Both phones support slow-motion video, raw image capture, manual settings for exposure, ISO, focus, and shutter speed (except the X300 Pro lacks manual shutter speed). The X200 Ultra also includes a front-facing LED flash, while the X300 Pro does not.

When it comes to flash features, the X200 Ultra has a dual-tone LED flash with three LEDs, while the X300 Pro has a two-LED flash. The X200 Ultra also has a BSI (Backside Illuminated) sensor, which is not present in the X300 Pro. The X200 Ultra's camera system can create panoramas in-camera, and both phones support timelapse functionality. In terms of zoom, both devices offer 3.7x optical zoom, but the X200 Ultra has a slightly wider minimum focal length of 35 mm, while the X300 Pro has a 15 mm minimum focal length, which may provide a different perspective in wide-angle shots.

The vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro both run on Android, with the X200 Ultra using Android 15 and the X300 Pro using Android 16. Both devices offer similar features in terms of privacy, such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. They also support theme customization, can block app tracking, and feature on-device machine learning. Neither device includes Mail Privacy Protection or blocks cross-site tracking.

Both phones support a variety of useful features, including notification permissions, media pickers, and the ability to play games while downloading. They also both have dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, and customizable notifications. Additionally, both devices allow offloading apps, support full-page screenshots, and have PiP (Picture-in-Picture) functionality. Focus modes and Quick Start are not available on either phone.

The X200 Ultra and X300 Pro are similar in terms of accessibility features as well, supporting Live Text, split screen, voice commands, offline voice recognition, and the ability to track the current position of the device. Both devices are multi-user systems and support widgets. The X200 Ultra is free and open-source, while the X300 Pro shares the same status, but the X200 Ultra does not provide a Quick Start feature, which is also missing from the X300 Pro.

The vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro both feature large batteries, with the X200 Ultra having a 6000 mAh battery and the X300 Pro offering a slightly larger 6510 mAh battery. Both devices support wireless charging, fast charging at 90W, and reverse wireless charging, with wireless charging speeds of 40W on both models. Additionally, both phones come with a charger and have rechargeable, non-removable batteries.

Both devices also include a battery level indicator, making it easy to monitor the remaining charge. The X200 Ultra and the X300 Pro share the same fast charging and wireless charging specifications, meaning their charging performance is identical in terms of speed and capabilities.

There are no notable differences in battery features, as both phones support the same functionalities, including wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, and the ability to charge at the same speed. The key difference lies in the battery capacity, with the X300 Pro offering a slightly larger 6510 mAh battery compared to the 6000 mAh battery of the X200 Ultra.

Both the vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, which may be a consideration for those who prefer wired headphones. However, both devices feature stereo speakers for an enhanced audio experience. The X200 Ultra supports a wider range of advanced audio codecs, including aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless, while the X300 Pro supports aptX, aptX HD, and lacks support for LDAC, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless.

Neither device includes an FM radio, so users will need to rely on other sources for radio functionality. While both phones support high-quality wireless audio, the X200 Ultra offers a more comprehensive range of audio technologies for a potentially more versatile and higher-quality wireless audio experience.

In summary, while both phones support stereo speakers and aptX HD for high-quality audio, the X200 Ultra stands out with its broader codec support, including LDAC and aptX Lossless, which may appeal to users looking for the best wireless audio performance.

The vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro both support 5G connectivity and feature dual SIM support. Both phones are equipped with Wi-Fi capabilities that include Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), ensuring fast and reliable internet connections. In terms of Bluetooth, the X200 Ultra uses Bluetooth version 5.4, while the X300 Pro has Bluetooth version 6, offering a slightly more recent version of the technology. Both devices offer NFC support, USB Type-C ports with USB 3.2, and high-speed download speeds (10,000 MBit/s for the X200 Ultra and 10,700 MBit/s for the X300 Pro).

Both models include a fingerprint scanner, emergency SOS via satellite, a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, an infrared sensor, an accelerometer, and a cellular module, with neither supporting motion tracking or optical tracking. Neither device includes a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. Both phones also support Galileo for satellite navigation.

The X200 Ultra and X300 Pro are quite similar in terms of connectivity features, with the main differences being in the Bluetooth version (5.4 vs. 6) and the download speed (10,000 MBit/s vs. 10,700 MBit/s). Both phones also lack an external memory slot and do not include a stylus or built-in projector.

Both the vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro come with a video light, which can be helpful for low-light video recording. However, the two devices differ in their display features. The X200 Ultra has a curved display, while the X300 Pro does not. Neither device features a sapphire glass display or an e-paper display, so both phones share similarities in terms of display material.

In summary, the main distinction between the two phones in this category is the curved display on the X200 Ultra, which the X300 Pro lacks.