Vivo X300 Pro VS ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra

Both the Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra offer waterproof capabilities, with a water resistance rating of IP69 and IP68, respectively. The X300 Pro's IP69 rating suggests a higher level of protection against dust and water ingress, compared to the Nubia Z80 Ultra's IP68, which offers strong resistance to dust and can handle immersion in water up to a certain depth, but not quite as thoroughly as the X300 Pro.

When it comes to size, the Vivo X300 Pro is slightly lighter at 226 g, while the ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra weighs 227 g, making the difference negligible. The X300 Pro has a thickness of 8 mm, a width of 75.5 mm, and a height of 161.2 mm, resulting in a volume of 97.3648 cm³. In comparison, the Nubia Z80 Ultra is a bit thicker at 8.6 mm, with a width of 77.2 mm, a height of 164.5 mm, and a larger volume of 109.21484 cm³. These slight size differences make the Z80 Ultra marginally bulkier than the X300 Pro.

Both phones share the same waterproof depth rating of 1.5 m, which means they are equally capable of surviving underwater for short periods. Neither model features a rugged build, and neither can be folded, so both devices are designed with standard durability in mind.

Both the Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The X300 Pro has a 6.78″ screen size, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra is slightly larger at 6.85″. In terms of pixel density, the X300 Pro offers a sharper 452 ppi, compared to the 431 ppi of the Z80 Ultra, which may result in slightly crisper details on the X300 Pro’s display.

The resolution on the X300 Pro is 1260 x 2800 px, while the Z80 Ultra comes with a resolution of 1216 x 2688 px. While both displays offer high resolutions, the X300 Pro’s display has a slight edge in terms of pixel count. In terms of refresh rate, the Nubia Z80 Ultra outperforms the X300 Pro with a 144Hz refresh rate, compared to the X300 Pro’s 120Hz. This may provide a smoother experience in fast-moving content on the Z80 Ultra.

Both devices support HDR10 and HDR10+, as well as Always-On Display, providing richer visuals and useful always-on features. The Vivo X300 Pro stands out with Dolby Vision support, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra lacks this feature. Neither phone includes a secondary screen, and both have touch screens for intuitive interaction.

Both the Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra offer impressive performance specifications. They both feature 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, providing ample space and memory for heavy tasks. The X300 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset. The X300 Pro’s CPU has a configuration of 1 core at 4.21 GHz, 3 cores at 3.5 GHz, and 4 cores at 2.7 GHz, while the Z80 Ultra’s CPU is clocked at 4.6 GHz for 2 cores and 3.62 GHz for 6 cores. Both phones support 64-bit architecture and big.LITTLE technology, but the CPU speeds differ, with the Nubia offering higher maximum speeds for the 2 high-performance cores.

In terms of Geekbench 6 scores, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 12189 in multi-core performance and 3781 in single-core performance, whereas the Z80 Ultra scores 10059 in multi-core and 3234 in single-core performance. This indicates that the Vivo X300 Pro achieves slightly higher performance in both tests. The GPU clock speeds also differ, with the X300 Pro featuring a Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU running at 1750 MHz, while the Z80 Ultra’s Adreno 830 GPU is clocked at 1200 MHz, which may affect GPU performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

Both devices have the same semiconductor size of 3 nm and maximum memory bandwidth of around 85 GB/s (85.3 GB/s for the X300 Pro and 85.1 GB/s for the Z80 Ultra). They also support the same version of OpenCL (version 3) and can handle up to 24GB of maximum memory. The X300 Pro has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra has an 8 MB L3 cache. Both devices support multithreading and have DDR memory version 5, which allows for efficient multitasking and faster memory speeds.

The Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra both feature triple-lens main cameras, but with different megapixel configurations. The X300 Pro offers a 200 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP setup, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra comes with a 64 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP configuration. The X300 Pro’s main camera lenses have wide apertures of f/2.7, f/1.6, and f/2.0, respectively, while the Z80 Ultra’s lenses have apertures of f/2.4, f/1.7, and f/1.8. The X300 Pro also has a higher optical zoom of 3.7x, compared to the 2.7x on the Nubia Z80 Ultra, allowing for more detailed zoomed-in shots.

Both devices feature a 50 MP front camera with a wide aperture of f/2.0 on the X300 Pro and f/2.0 on the Z80 Ultra, ensuring high-quality selfies. Neither device has a dual-lens front camera, but both support video recording with the main camera at 4320 x 30 fps. The X300 Pro does not have a dual-tone LED flash, whereas the Z80 Ultra includes this feature, both devices using 2 flash LEDs. Both models also offer features like built-in optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus, manual exposure, raw shooting, and slow-motion video recording.

In terms of additional camera functions, the X300 Pro supports HDR10 recording and has a laser autofocus system for both the front and rear cameras, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra supports HDR10 recording and lacks this feature for the front camera. Neither model has a front-facing LED flash, front-facing camera under the display, or RGB LED flash. The X300 Pro’s minimum focal length is 15 mm and maximum focal length is 85 mm, compared to the Z80 Ultra’s minimum focal length of 18 mm and maximum of 70 mm. Both phones support timelapse and panorama modes, and both lack 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both the Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra run on Android 16 and offer a wide array of similar features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also support blocking app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media pickers, dark mode, and full-page screenshots. Other shared features include the ability to play games while downloading, the option to offload apps, customizable notifications, PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode, Live Text, and offline voice recognition. Both phones also track the current position of the device and support widgets, voice commands, and a multi-user system.

There are some differences in the operating system features. The Vivo X300 Pro has a few features not listed for the Z80 Ultra, such as a battery health check, extra dim mode, and child lock. On the other hand, the Z80 Ultra has a feature for HDR10 recording, while the Vivo X300 Pro lacks it. Neither device supports focus modes, and neither can be used as a PC. Additionally, both phones have PiP mode and share similar capabilities in terms of quick start options.

Both devices also support the use of sharing intents and have manual exposure. The Vivo X300 Pro allows for manual shutter speed adjustments, while the Z80 Ultra does not. Both devices include a child lock and a quick start mode, though neither can be used as a personal computer. Despite these differences, both phones have identical software offerings in many aspects, providing similar flexibility for user customization and functionality.

The Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra both feature large batteries, with the X300 Pro packing a 6510 mAh battery, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra has a larger 7200 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging at 90W, ensuring quick recharges. However, the wireless charging speeds differ: the Vivo X300 Pro supports wireless charging at 40W, while the Nubia Z80 Ultra can charge wirelessly at 80W, offering a faster wireless charging experience for the Z80 Ultra.

Both devices also feature reverse wireless charging, though this is supported by the Vivo X300 Pro but not the Nubia Z80 Ultra. Neither phone has a removable battery, and both come with a battery level indicator to keep track of charge status. Both devices are equipped with rechargeable batteries, providing the convenience of long-lasting power without the need for frequent battery swaps.

In summary, while both devices offer strong battery performance, the Z80 Ultra stands out with its larger battery capacity and faster wireless charging speed. The Vivo X300 Pro, on the other hand, provides reverse wireless charging, a feature absent in the Z80 Ultra.

Both the Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. Both phones feature stereo speakers, providing enhanced audio quality for media playback. When it comes to wireless audio technologies, both devices support aptX and aptX HD for high-quality Bluetooth audio. However, the Z80 Ultra has an additional advantage with support for aptX Adaptive, which dynamically adjusts audio quality based on the connection, while the X300 Pro does not support this feature.

Neither phone supports aptX Lossless, and neither includes a built-in radio, so users will need to rely on streaming services for music. Overall, both phones deliver solid audio experiences, but the Z80 Ultra offers a slight edge with aptX Adaptive support for more flexible wireless audio performance.

Both the Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra support 5G connectivity and have dual SIM card slots, offering fast and flexible mobile data options. In terms of Wi-Fi, the Vivo X300 Pro supports Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and the latest Wi-Fi 7, while the Z80 Ultra also supports Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7 but adds Wi-Fi 6E, providing an additional layer of performance and future-proofing for the Z80 Ultra.

Both phones have Bluetooth capabilities, with the X300 Pro featuring Bluetooth 6 and the Z80 Ultra featuring Bluetooth 5.4. The Vivo X300 Pro also boasts a faster download speed of 10700 MBits/s compared to the Z80 Ultra’s 10000 MBits/s, though both speeds are impressive. Both devices have NFC, USB Type-C, a fingerprint scanner, and support GPS and Galileo, ensuring strong connectivity and navigation capabilities. The X300 Pro supports emergency SOS via satellite, while the Z80 Ultra does not have this feature.

Other similarities include both phones having an infrared sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, and cellular module. Neither device includes a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, or stylus, and neither has motion tracking or optical tracking. Both devices also lack a built-in projector. Overall, the X300 Pro and Z80 Ultra offer similar connectivity features, but the Z80 Ultra provides a slight advantage with Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.4, while the X300 Pro stands out with its emergency SOS via satellite.

Both the Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra are equipped with a video light, which can be useful for improving lighting during video recording or photography in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays. These similarities highlight that both phones offer standard display technologies without any additional premium features in this category.

In summary, while both phones provide a video light, they do not include any specialized display features like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper, keeping their design and display functionality more conventional.