Vivo X300 VS Vivo X300 Pro

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro offer waterproof capabilities with an IP69 rating, ensuring protection against dust and water immersion up to 1.5 meters. Neither model has a rugged build, and neither can be folded.

The Vivo X300 weighs 190 g, while the Vivo X300 Pro is slightly heavier at 226 g. In terms of size, the X300 is more compact with a thickness of 8 mm, a width of 71.9 mm, and a height of 150.6 mm, compared to the X300 Pro's larger dimensions of 8 mm thickness, 75.5 mm width, and 161.2 mm height. The X300 also has a smaller volume at 86.62512 cm³, while the X300 Pro's volume is 97.3648 cm³.

Overall, both models share several design features, including waterproofing and similar thickness, but the X300 Pro is notably larger and heavier than the standard X300.

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro feature an OLED/AMOLED display, providing vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The X300 has a 6.31″ screen size, while the X300 Pro offers a larger 6.78″ display. In terms of resolution, the X300 comes with a 1216 x 2640 px resolution, while the X300 Pro has a slightly higher 1260 x 2800 px resolution.

For pixel density, the Vivo X300 offers 460 ppi, which is a bit higher than the X300 Pro's 452 ppi. Both devices have a 120Hz refresh rate and a 300Hz touch sampling rate, ensuring smooth interactions. The Vivo X300 and X300 Pro also support HDR10 and HDR10+ for enhanced color and contrast in supported content, and both offer an Always-On Display feature.

The Vivo X300 lacks branded damage-resistant glass, while the X300 Pro includes this feature for added durability. Additionally, the X300 Pro supports Dolby Vision, while the X300 does not. Both models share a contrast ratio of 8000000:1, and neither has a secondary screen. Both also include a touch screen, ensuring responsive user input.

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro come with the same amount of internal storage, offering 1024GB, and both are equipped with 16GB of RAM. They feature the same MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, Mali G1 Ultra MP12 GPU, and a CPU configuration with 1 x 4.21 GHz, 3 x 3.5 GHz, and 4 x 2.7 GHz cores. Both phones also have the same Geekbench 6 results for multi-core (12189) and single-core (3781) performance, as well as the same GPU clock speed of 1750 MHz.

Other shared specifications include RAM speed of 5333 MHz, a semiconductor size of 3 nm, and support for 64-bit processing. Both devices also have integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and use big.LITTLE technology with 8 CPU threads. Both phones support HMP (Heterogeneous Multi-Processing), multithreading, and have a maximum memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. Additionally, they both have 16 MB of L3 cache, OpenCL version 3, and support DDR5 memory.

There is a difference in performance between the two models, as the Vivo X300 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 4011900, while the X300 Pro scores slightly lower with 3015900. However, this difference does not affect any other core specifications, as all other performance-related features match between the two models.

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro feature a triple-lens main camera setup, each with 200 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP lenses. However, the wide apertures of these lenses differ slightly: the Vivo X300 has 1.7, 2.6, and 2f apertures, while the Vivo X300 Pro has 2.7, 1.6, and 2f apertures. Both models have built-in optical image stabilization and support features like continuous autofocus during video recording, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and slow-motion video recording. They also share the ability to shoot raw images and have a flash with two LEDs, although neither includes a dual-tone LED flash.

When it comes to video recording, the Vivo X300 supports 2160 x 60 fps resolution, while the X300 Pro supports 4320 x 30 fps, providing a higher resolution but at a lower frame rate. Both phones also have HDR mode, manual exposure, and manual white balance. Neither has a front-facing LED flash, a dual-lens front camera, or Dolby Vision recording capabilities, and neither can shoot 360° panoramas or use a front-facing camera under the display.

The Vivo X300 and X300 Pro both include a front camera with 50 MP resolution and a 2f aperture. Both models also support timelapse functions, with a minimum focal length of 15 mm and a maximum focal length of 70 mm for the X300, and 85 mm for the X300 Pro. Notably, the X300 Pro has slightly better optical zoom at 3.7x compared to the X300’s 3x optical zoom.

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro run on Android 16, offering a wide range of features for privacy, customization, and user experience. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. They also share features like on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, offloading apps, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, and picture-in-picture (PiP) mode.

Both phones are equipped with features like offline voice recognition, voice commands, device location tracking, multi-user system support, sharing intents, a child lock, widgets, and they are free and open-source. Neither model supports Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, or Quick Start. Additionally, both devices do not get direct OS updates.

Overall, the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro offer an identical set of features in terms of operating system capabilities, with no notable differences between the two in this category.

The Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro both feature substantial battery capacities, with the X300 having a 6040 mAh battery and the X300 Pro offering a slightly larger 6510 mAh battery. Both models support wireless charging with a speed of 40W, as well as fast charging at 90W. Neither phone has a removable battery, but both include a battery level indicator and are equipped with rechargeable batteries.

A key difference between the two is that the Vivo X300 does not support reverse wireless charging, while the Vivo X300 Pro does offer this feature, allowing it to wirelessly charge other devices.

Overall, both phones provide robust battery features, but the X300 Pro has a larger battery and the added functionality of reverse wireless charging, which is not available on the X300.

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so they do not support wired audio connections. However, both devices feature stereo speakers for enhanced sound quality. Additionally, both phones support aptX and aptX HD for high-quality Bluetooth audio streaming, but neither supports LDAC, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless.

Neither the X300 nor the X300 Pro includes a radio, so users cannot listen to FM radio on either device.

Overall, the audio features of the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro are nearly identical, with both supporting high-quality Bluetooth audio codecs but lacking support for a wired audio jack, LDAC, or a built-in radio.

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro support 5G connectivity and are equipped with Wi-Fi versions 4, 5, 6, and 7. They each support 2 SIM cards, have NFC, and feature a USB Type-C port with USB 3.2. Bluetooth connectivity is supported by both devices, with the X300 featuring Bluetooth 5.4 and the X300 Pro offering Bluetooth 6. Both models have a fingerprint scanner and similar GPS, compass, accelerometer, infrared sensor, and cellular module capabilities.

The Vivo X300 and X300 Pro share several additional features, including a download speed of 10700 MBits/s, support for Galileo, and an identical lack of an external memory slot, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, stylus, motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector. Both phones also lack a barometer and crash detection, but the X300 Pro is equipped with emergency SOS via satellite, which the X300 does not offer.

Overall, the main differences between the Vivo X300 and X300 Pro in this group are the inclusion of emergency SOS via satellite in the X300 Pro and the slightly newer Bluetooth version 6 in the X300 Pro. Otherwise, their connectivity and feature sets are nearly identical.

Both the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro feature a video light, making them suitable for capturing videos in low-light conditions. Neither device comes with sapphire glass, curved display, or e-paper display technology.

Overall, the Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Pro are identical in terms of miscellaneous features, as both offer the same set of capabilities in this category.