Vivo X300 VS Xiaomi 15T Pro

Both the Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro offer waterproof designs, with the Vivo X300 featuring an IP69 rating and a waterproof depth rating of 1.5 meters, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro has a slightly lower IP68 rating but supports a deeper waterproof depth of 3 meters.

In terms of size and weight, the Vivo X300 is lighter at 190 grams, compared to the 210 grams of the Xiaomi 15T Pro. The Vivo X300 is also slightly more compact, with a thickness of 8 mm, a width of 71.9 mm, and a height of 150.6 mm, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro is larger, with a width of 77.9 mm, a height of 162.7 mm, and the same thickness of 8 mm.

When it comes to volume, the Xiaomi 15T Pro is bulkier, with a volume of 101.39 cm³, compared to the Vivo X300's 86.63 cm³. Both devices have no rugged build and cannot be folded, making them similar in terms of design durability.

Both the Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro feature OLED/AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The Vivo X300 has a 6.31″ screen with a pixel density of 460 ppi, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro boasts a larger 6.83″ screen with a slightly lower pixel density of 447 ppi.

In terms of resolution, the Vivo X300 offers 1216 x 2640 px, compared to the Xiaomi 15T Pro's higher resolution of 1280 x 2772 px. The Vivo X300 also has a contrast ratio of 8000000:1, which is higher than the Xiaomi 15T Pro's 5000000:1.

Both devices support HDR10 and HDR10+, as well as Always-On Display functionality. However, the Xiaomi 15T Pro has the added advantage of supporting Dolby Vision, a feature not present on the Vivo X300. The Vivo X300 has a 120Hz refresh rate with a 300Hz touch sampling rate, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro offers a smoother 144Hz refresh rate and a 480Hz touch sampling rate. Both phones do not have branded damage-resistant glass, nor do they include a secondary screen.

The Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro both feature impressive performance specs, but with notable differences. Both phones come with 1024GB of internal storage, but the Vivo X300 has a larger 16GB of RAM, compared to the 12GB of RAM in the Xiaomi 15T Pro.

In terms of benchmark scores, the Vivo X300 leads with an AnTuTu score of 4,011,900, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro scored 2,718,159. Similarly, the Vivo X300 has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core result of 12,189, compared to the Xiaomi 15T Pro's 8,969. For single-core performance, the Vivo X300 also outperforms with a score of 3,781 versus the Xiaomi 15T Pro's 2,874.

Both devices use a 3nm semiconductor and feature the big.LITTLE architecture, along with integrated LTE and multithreading support. The Vivo X300 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 chipset, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. The Vivo X300's GPU, the Mali G1 Ultra MP12, has a higher clock speed of 1750 MHz, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro's Immortalis G925 GPU runs at 1300 MHz. Additionally, the Vivo X300's L3 cache is 16 MB, compared to the Xiaomi 15T Pro's 12 MB, and the Vivo X300's RAM speed is 5333 MHz, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro features faster RAM at 10667 MHz.

The Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro both feature multi-lens main cameras, but with different configurations. The Vivo X300 has a 200 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP setup, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro includes a 50 MP, 50 MP, and 12 MP configuration. The wide apertures of the main cameras are also slightly different: the Vivo X300 offers 1.7, 2.6, and 2f, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro has 1.6, 3, and 2.2f.

Both phones have a 50 MP front camera on the Vivo X300 and a 32 MP front camera on the Xiaomi 15T Pro, with the Vivo X300 having a slightly wider aperture of 2f compared to the Xiaomi's 2.2f. Both devices have built-in optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and continuous autofocus when recording video. The Vivo X300 supports 4K video recording at 60 fps, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro offers a slightly higher 8K recording resolution at 30 fps.

In terms of additional features, both devices support slow-motion video, have manual exposure, flash, and HDR modes, as well as the ability to shoot panoramas. The Vivo X300 offers optical zoom up to 3x, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro provides a 5x optical zoom. Both phones allow for shooting in RAW format and have a timelapse function, but the Xiaomi 15T Pro supports HDR10 recording, a feature not available on the Vivo X300. Neither phone supports Dolby Vision recording, and both lack front-facing LED flashes or a dual-lens front camera.

The Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro both run Android 16 and share many features when it comes to privacy, customization, and functionality. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and support for blocking app tracking. They also both feature on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, the ability to play games while downloading, dark mode, battery health check, and an extra dim mode.

Both phones support dynamic theming, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split screen functionality. Neither device supports Wi-Fi password sharing, Quick Start, or the ability to be used as a PC. Additionally, both phones feature PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode, sharing intents, a child lock, widgets, offline voice recognition, and voice commands. They also have multi-user systems and can track the current position of the mobile device.

The main difference between the Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro is that the Vivo X300 lacks focus modes, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro has the same set of features but without any notable differences in the specs provided. Both devices are free and open source, ensuring users have access to greater customization and control over their devices.

The Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro both offer solid battery performance, with the Vivo X300 featuring a 6040 mAh battery, which is larger than the Xiaomi 15T Pro's 5500 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging at 90W, ensuring rapid power-ups. However, the Xiaomi 15T Pro supports faster wireless charging at 50W, compared to the Vivo X300's 40W wireless charging speed.

Neither device has a removable battery, but both come with rechargeable batteries, a battery level indicator, and support for wireless charging. The Vivo X300 lacks reverse wireless charging, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro includes this feature, allowing it to charge other devices wirelessly.

Both devices share the capability of fast charging and wireless charging, providing convenient and efficient ways to keep the phones powered throughout the day. The differences mainly come down to the Xiaomi 15T Pro's additional reverse wireless charging feature and slightly faster wireless charging speed.

Both the Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro feature stereo speakers, providing an enhanced audio experience. Neither device has a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions.

When it comes to Bluetooth audio, both phones support aptX, which ensures high-quality audio streaming. The Vivo X300 also supports aptX HD, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro includes support for LDAC, offering high-resolution audio streaming over Bluetooth.

Neither phone supports aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless, and neither device has a built-in radio. The main difference between the two lies in the Bluetooth audio technologies: the Vivo X300 supports aptX HD, whereas the Xiaomi 15T Pro supports LDAC, offering slightly different options for users who prioritize wireless audio quality.

Both the Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro support 5G connectivity, allowing for fast mobile internet speeds. They also both have dual SIM card slots. The Vivo X300 offers Wi-Fi support across Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), while the Xiaomi 15T Pro includes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), with the latter adding support for the newer Wi-Fi 6E standard.

In terms of Bluetooth, the Vivo X300 features Bluetooth 5.4, while the Xiaomi 15T Pro uses Bluetooth 6, offering a slightly more recent version. The Vivo X300 supports a download speed of 10,700 MBits/s, significantly faster than the Xiaomi 15T Pro’s 7,300 MBits/s download speed. Both phones have NFC, a fingerprint scanner, a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, and an accelerometer, along with infrared sensors, but neither has a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner.

Both devices do not include an external memory slot, a stylus, motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector. Additionally, they both support Galileo for satellite navigation. The Xiaomi 15T Pro lacks the support for Wi-Fi 6E, which the Vivo X300 offers, but it does have Bluetooth 6, offering slightly newer connectivity standards overall.

Both the Vivo X300 and Xiaomi 15T Pro come with a video light, which is useful for improving lighting in low-light environments when recording or taking photos. Neither device features sapphire glass display protection, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning they both rely on standard display materials and designs without the additional durability or functionality that these features provide.

These two smartphones are similar in their miscellaneous features, with no notable differences in the specified aspects. The video light is the only shared enhancement in this category, while other display technologies and design features, like sapphire glass or curved displays, are absent from both models.

In summary, both phones provide a video light but lack more advanced display options such as sapphire glass or curved screens, keeping their designs relatively straightforward in this regard.