Vivo Y31 5G VS Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB

The Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB are both waterproof, boasting an IP68 Ingress Protection rating. This means they are resistant to dust and can withstand submersion in water. In terms of weight, the Vivo Y31 5G weighs 209 g, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 is slightly heavier at 215.7 g, a difference of 6.7 g. Both phones have similar dimensions in height and width, with the Vivo Y31 measuring 166.1 mm tall and 77 mm wide, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 is slightly shorter at 163.1 mm tall and a bit wider at 77.9 mm. The Vivo Y31 5G is thicker at 8.4 mm compared to the Xiaomi Poco F7, which is 8.2 mm thick.

Regarding volume, the Vivo Y31 5G has a slightly larger volume of 107.43 cm³, whereas the Xiaomi Poco F7 has a volume of 104.19 cm³, making it a bit more compact overall. Both phones feature a waterproof build, but neither has a rugged build, and neither can be folded.

Both models offer similar water resistance features and are similar in terms of size and thickness, with the main differences being in weight and volume, with the Vivo Y31 5G being a bit heavier and bulkier than the Xiaomi Poco F7.

The Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB have different display technologies. The Vivo Y31 5G uses an LCD IPS display, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 features an OLED/AMOLED display. The screen sizes also vary, with the Vivo Y31 having a 6.68″ display and the Xiaomi Poco F7 slightly larger at 6.83″. In terms of pixel density, the Vivo Y31 has 264 ppi, whereas the Xiaomi Poco F7 offers a much higher 447 ppi, meaning the Poco F7 has more pixels per inch and sharper details on screen.

Resolution-wise, the Vivo Y31 5G has a 720 x 1608 px display, which is lower than the Xiaomi Poco F7’s 1280 x 2772 px resolution, giving the Poco F7 a higher resolution and clearer visuals. Both phones support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and transitions. Both displays also feature branded damage-resistant glass for added durability.

The Vivo Y31 5G does not support HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 supports HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, offering more advanced color and contrast capabilities. Additionally, the Poco F7 has an Always-On Display feature, which the Vivo Y31 lacks. Both phones do not have a secondary screen and are equipped with touch screens.

The Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB differ significantly in performance specifications. The Vivo Y31 5G has 128GB of internal storage and 6GB of RAM, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 offers double the storage at 256GB and 12GB of RAM, making it more capable in terms of memory and storage. Both phones feature a Qualcomm chipset, with the Vivo Y31 5G using the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 and the Xiaomi Poco F7 utilizing the more powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. The Vivo Y31’s chipset has a CPU configuration of 2 cores at 2.3 GHz and 6 cores at 2 GHz, while the Poco F7 has a more complex CPU setup with 3 cores at 3.01 GHz, 2 cores at 2.8 GHz, 2 cores at 2.02 GHz, and 1 core at 3.21 GHz.

In terms of GPU, the Vivo Y31 5G is equipped with the Adreno 613 GPU, clocked at 955 MHz, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 has the more powerful Adreno 825 GPU with a clock speed of 1150 MHz. The Vivo Y31’s RAM operates at a speed of 3200 MHz, whereas the Xiaomi Poco F7 has faster 4800 MHz RAM. Both phones are built on a 4 nm semiconductor and support 64-bit processing. The Vivo Y31 5G supports a maximum memory of 16GB, while the Poco F7 supports up to 24GB of memory, giving it a greater capacity for future upgrades.

Both devices have integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and support for DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2. The Vivo Y31 has an eMMC 5.1 version, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 also features the same eMMC version. The Vivo Y31 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 4W, while the Poco F7 has a significantly higher TDP of 12.5W, indicating higher power requirements for the Poco F7's more advanced performance. The Vivo Y31 supports two displays, while the Poco F7 supports just one display.

The Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB have different camera setups. The Vivo Y31 5G features a single 50 MP main camera with an aperture of 1.8f, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 has a dual-lens main camera with a 50 MP and 8 MP sensor, with apertures of 2.2f and 1.5f, respectively. Both phones offer a wide range of camera features, including phase-detection autofocus, manual exposure, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. However, the Poco F7's dual-lens system offers additional versatility compared to the single-lens configuration of the Vivo Y31.

For front cameras, the Vivo Y31 5G is equipped with an 8 MP camera with a 2f aperture, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 features a more powerful 20 MP front camera with a 2.2f aperture. Both phones support HDR and have manual white balance, manual ISO, and manual focus. They also support slow-motion video recording, timelapse, and continuous autofocus during video recording. The Vivo Y31 5G lacks a front-facing LED flash, while the Poco F7 does not feature a front-facing LED flash either but provides a more powerful front camera overall.

When it comes to video recording, the Vivo Y31 5G can record at 1080 x 30 fps, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 offers higher resolution video recording at 2160 x 60 fps. Both phones lack optical zoom and laser autofocus, and neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. However, the Xiaomi Poco F7 stands out with the ability to shoot raw images, which the Vivo Y31 5G cannot do.

Both the Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB run on Android 15 and share many features in terms of privacy, customization, and user experience. They both offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. They also support dark mode, battery health checks, and extra dim modes. Additionally, both phones allow offloading apps and feature dynamic theming, customizable notifications, and full-page screenshots.

However, there are a few differences between the two. The Xiaomi Poco F7 supports Wi-Fi password sharing, while the Vivo Y31 5G does not. Both devices lack Mail Privacy Protection, focus modes, and Quick Start. Additionally, both phones do not support direct OS updates, and neither can be used as a PC. They both feature offline voice recognition, voice commands, and track the mobile device's position, with the ability to use them in a multi-user system. Both support widgets and sharing intents, as well as Live Text and PiP.

Overall, the software experience is quite similar, with only minor differences such as the Vivo Y31 5G missing Wi-Fi password sharing and both phones lacking support for direct OS updates and PC use.

Both the Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB are equipped with a 6500 mAh battery, providing substantial power. Neither device supports wireless charging, but both support fast charging. The Vivo Y31 5G offers fast charging at 44W, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 supports a faster 90W charging speed. The Vivo Y31 5G comes with a charger included in the box, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 does not include a charger. Neither phone has a removable battery, and both feature a rechargeable battery with a battery level indicator.

In summary, while both phones have the same battery capacity, the Xiaomi Poco F7 stands out with its faster 90W charging speed, compared to the 44W of the Vivo Y31 5G. However, the Vivo Y31 5G includes a charger in the box, while the Poco F7 does not.

Overall, both devices provide solid battery performance, but the Xiaomi Poco F7 offers faster charging capabilities, though it lacks an included charger in the box.

Both the Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, but both feature stereo speakers for audio output. The Vivo Y31 5G does not support any aptX audio technologies, such as aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. In contrast, the Xiaomi Poco F7 supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, but does not support aptX Lossless.

Neither phone comes with a built-in radio. The key difference between these two devices in the audio category lies in their support for advanced Bluetooth audio technologies. The Xiaomi Poco F7 offers a broader range of aptX technologies, providing potentially better wireless audio quality compared to the Vivo Y31 5G, which does not support any aptX variations.

Overall, both phones provide stereo sound, but the Xiaomi Poco F7 has a clear advantage in terms of Bluetooth audio capabilities, offering more advanced codec support compared to the Vivo Y31 5G.

Both the Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB support 5G connectivity, offering fast download and upload speeds. The Vivo Y31 5G has a download speed of 2500 MBits/s and an upload speed of 900 MBits/s, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 supports faster download speeds of 4200 MBits/s and upload speeds of 3500 MBits/s. In terms of Wi-Fi, both phones support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), but the Xiaomi Poco F7 additionally supports Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), providing more advanced wireless connectivity options.

The Vivo Y31 5G has a Bluetooth version 4.2, whereas the Xiaomi Poco F7 features the more recent Bluetooth version 6, enabling faster and more reliable connections with other devices. The Vivo Y31 5G has an external memory slot, while the Xiaomi Poco F7 does not, meaning the Y31 5G allows for expandable storage. Both devices have NFC support, a fingerprint scanner, and support for GPS and Galileo, but the Xiaomi Poco F7 additionally includes an infrared sensor, which the Vivo Y31 5G lacks.

Both phones support SIM cards (2 SIM) and include USB Type-C, but neither includes an HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. Other features such as motion tracking, optical tracking, and a built-in projector are also absent in both models. Both phones lack support for emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, and barometers. Overall, while both phones share many core connectivity and feature specs, the Xiaomi Poco F7 stands out with its faster connectivity options, more recent Bluetooth version, and the inclusion of an infrared sensor.

Both the Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB are equipped with a video light, making them suitable for video recording in low-light conditions. Neither phone features sapphire glass display, curved displays, or e-paper displays, so both devices have standard flat displays without these specialized features.

In summary, the two devices are identical in terms of their miscellaneous features, with both supporting a video light but lacking the more premium or specialized display technologies like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

Overall, the miscellaneous features of both the Vivo Y31 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB are quite similar, offering basic but useful video lighting without any advanced display technologies.