Vivo Y400 5G VS Vivo Y400 Pro 5G

The Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G have distinct design characteristics, especially when it comes to their water resistance and physical dimensions. The Vivo Y400 5G is rated with an IP68 Ingress Protection, which means it is waterproof, offering a higher level of protection against dust and water compared to the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G, which has an IP65 rating, indicating it is only water resistant, not fully waterproof.

In terms of size, the Vivo Y400 5G is slightly heavier at 197 g, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G weighs 182 g, making it a bit lighter. The thickness of both phones is fairly similar, with the Vivo Y400 5G measuring 7.9 mm thick and the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G being slightly slimmer at 7.7 mm. The height and width of both devices are quite close, with the Vivo Y400 5G standing at 162.3 mm tall and 75.3 mm wide, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G is 163.8 mm tall and 75 mm wide. These size differences make both phones very comparable in overall footprint.

The volume of the two devices also reflects their near-identical sizes, with the Vivo Y400 5G having a volume of 96.55 cm³ and the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G measuring 94.59 cm³. Both phones lack a rugged build and the ability to fold, indicating a more standard design for each model.

The displays on the Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share many similarities, though there are a few differences. Both models feature OLED/AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and responsiveness. The screen size is slightly larger on the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G, with a 6.77″ display compared to the 6.67″ screen on the Vivo Y400 5G. The resolution on both phones is 1080 x 2400 px for the Y400 5G and 1080 x 2392 px for the Y400 Pro 5G, making the difference in pixel count virtually negligible.

The pixel density on the Vivo Y400 5G is 395 ppi, which is slightly higher than the 388 ppi on the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G. However, this small difference in pixel density is unlikely to have a noticeable impact on everyday use. Brightness levels also differ between the two, with the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G reaching a peak brightness of 1300 nits, compared to 1200 nits on the Vivo Y400 5G, offering a slightly brighter display on the Pro model.

Both devices support HDR10, have an Always-On Display feature, and include a touch screen, with no branded damage-resistant glass or support for HDR10+ or Dolby Vision. Neither phone features a secondary screen. These display specs show a very similar design philosophy, with the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G offering slightly larger dimensions and a marginally brighter display.

The Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G both offer strong performance features, but there are key differences in their chipsets and GPU. The Vivo Y400 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset with an Adreno 613 GPU, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset and a Mali G615 MC2 GPU. The CPU configurations differ as well, with the Y400 5G featuring 2 cores at 2.3 GHz and 6 cores at 2.0 GHz, while the Y400 Pro 5G has 4 cores at 2.5 GHz and 4 cores at 2.0 GHz, showing a slight difference in processing power distribution between the two models.

Both phones come with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. However, the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a higher RAM speed at 6400 MHz, compared to the Y400 5G's 3200 MHz, which could result in better performance in memory-intensive tasks on the Pro model. Both phones support a maximum memory of 16GB, DDR5 memory, and use 4nm semiconductors, offering modern processing power. They also both support 64-bit computing and integrate LTE connectivity.

In terms of GPU clock speed, the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has a higher clock speed of 1047 MHz compared to the 955 MHz of the Vivo Y400 5G. The Vivo Y400 5G supports up to two displays, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G supports just one display. Both phones use big.LITTLE technology and support DirectX 12, offering strong graphical and computational performance in line with current standards.

The camera setups on the Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G are quite similar in many aspects. Both devices feature a dual-lens main camera with 50 MP and 2 MP sensors, and both have a wide aperture of 2.4f for the main camera and 1.8f for the secondary lens. Additionally, both phones have a 32 MP front camera with a wide aperture of 2.5f, ensuring strong selfie performance.

Where the two models differ is in video recording capabilities. The Vivo Y400 5G supports video recording at 1080 x 30 fps, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G can record at a higher resolution of 2160 x 30 fps. Both phones offer features like phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during movie recording, and the ability to shoot slow-motion video. Neither model includes optical image stabilization or a dual-tone LED flash, but both phones have a single flash LED and a CMOS sensor for imaging.

Other camera features are also comparable, with both devices offering a built-in HDR mode, manual exposure, manual ISO, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, 3D photo/video recording, or a front-facing camera under the display. Both phones also include a timelapse function and manual white balance adjustments, providing a solid set of camera tools for various shooting scenarios.

Both the Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G run on Android 15 and offer nearly identical software features. They both include clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. Additionally, both models support blocking app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, and a media picker. They also allow playing games while downloading and feature dark mode, battery health check, and an extra dim mode.

Both phones also support dynamic theming, offloading apps, customizable notifications, and Live Text. They include full-page screenshots, split-screen support, and Picture-in-Picture (PiP) functionality. The child lock, multi-user system, and offline voice recognition are also present in both models. Additionally, both phones have voice commands, track the device's current position, and support widgets.

Despite the similarities, the Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share a few features in common that are worth noting, such as not supporting Wi-Fi password sharing, Mail Privacy Protection, or Quick Start. Neither phone gets direct OS updates, and both are free and open source. All features listed are identical across the two devices with no differences in terms of operating system capabilities.

The Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G feature similar battery capabilities, but there are some differences in their battery power. The Vivo Y400 5G has a larger 6000 mAh battery, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G comes with a 5500 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging at 90W, allowing for quick recharging times. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have a non-removable rechargeable battery.

Both phones include a battery level indicator, making it easy to monitor battery status, and they share the same rechargeable battery type, ensuring both models can be charged multiple times over their lifespan.

In summary, while the Vivo Y400 5G has a slightly larger battery capacity, both devices offer identical fast charging capabilities and similar overall battery features.

Both the Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G share similar audio features. Neither model includes a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, so wired audio solutions would require an adapter. Both phones feature stereo speakers, delivering a richer sound experience compared to single-speaker designs.

In terms of Bluetooth audio, neither device supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, meaning neither phone offers advanced high-quality Bluetooth audio streaming support.

Additionally, neither model includes a built-in radio, further aligning the audio feature sets of both devices.

Both the Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G offer similar connectivity and feature sets, with both supporting 5G connectivity, dual SIM cards, and NFC. They also include USB Type-C ports, though both use USB version 2. The Wi-Fi support is the same for both, offering Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). Bluetooth is supported on both models, with the Vivo Y400 5G using Bluetooth 5.0, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has Bluetooth 5.4, offering a slightly newer version.

In terms of download and upload speeds, the Vivo Y400 5G supports download speeds of 2500 MBits/s and upload speeds of 900 MBits/s, while the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G offers faster download speeds of 3270 MBits/s and upload speeds of 3270 MBits/s. Both phones feature a fingerprint scanner, a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and a compass, providing a solid range of sensors for navigation and security.

Neither model includes a memory card slot, infrared sensor, or HDMI output, and neither supports 3D facial recognition, iris scanning, or includes a stylus. Both phones support Galileo and lack motion or optical tracking capabilities, as well as a built-in projector. These connectivity and feature sets are quite similar, with the main difference being the faster data speeds on the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G due to its higher download and upload speeds.

Both the Vivo Y400 5G and Vivo Y400 Pro 5G come with a video light, which can be useful for low-light photography or video recording. Neither phone features sapphire glass displays, so users will need to rely on standard display protection. Both devices also have curved displays, giving them a sleek, modern look. Additionally, neither model has an e-paper display, so they rely on traditional screen technologies for display functionality.

In summary, the miscellaneous features are identical across both devices, with both supporting video lighting, curved displays, and lacking sapphire glass or e-paper displays.