Xiaomi 17 Pro Max VS Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra differ in several design aspects. The Pro Max is waterproof with an IP68 rating, meaning it can withstand being submerged up to 6 meters in water, while the Ultra does not have a specified water resistance rating.

In terms of weight, the Ultra is slightly heavier at 230 g compared to the 219 g of the Pro Max. Both devices have similar dimensions, with identical width (77.6 mm) and height (162.9 mm). However, the Pro Max has a thickness of 8 mm, while the Ultra is slightly thicker at 8.5 mm.

The volume of the Pro Max is 101.12832 cm³, which is a bit smaller than the Ultra's 107.44884 cm³. Both phones have a waterproof depth rating of 6 meters, but the Pro Max benefits from the higher IP68 rating compared to the Ultra's IP69 rating, which is generally used for devices that can withstand more extreme conditions like high-pressure water jets. Neither phone features a rugged build or can be folded.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra feature very similar displays. Both phones use OLED/AMOLED screens, have a 6.9″ screen size, and share the same pixel density of 416 ppi. The resolution is also identical at 1200 x 2608 px, and both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visuals.

Both phones offer branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision support. They also feature Always-On Display for quick information without unlocking the screen. However, there is a difference when it comes to the secondary screen: the Pro Max has a secondary screen, while the Ultra does not.

Both devices are touch screen enabled, with no differences in this feature across the two models.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra have nearly identical performance specifications. Both models feature 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, along with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset and Adreno 830 GPU. The CPU in both devices operates with a configuration of 2 cores at 4.6 GHz and 6 cores at 3.62 GHz. Additionally, both devices use the same GPU clock speed of 1200 MHz.

There is a slight difference in the Geekbench 6 results: the Pro Max scored 10,059 in multi-core and 3,234 in single-core, while the Ultra scored slightly higher with 10,990 in multi-core and 3,530 in single-core. However, the rest of the performance specs, such as RAM speed (5300 MHz), CPU threads (8), and thermal design power (8.2W), are identical for both phones.

Both phones share the same semiconductor size of 3 nm, support 64-bit architecture, and are equipped with integrated LTE. They also have the same memory bandwidth (85.1 GB/s), L2 cache (12 MB), L1 cache (192 KB), and L3 cache (8 MB). Other features like DirectX 12 support, OpenGL 3.2, multithreading, and ECC memory support are also present in both devices.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra have some differences in their camera specifications. The Pro Max features a triple-lens main camera with 50 MP sensors on each lens, offering wide apertures of 1.7f, 2.4f, and 2.6f, whereas the Ultra has a main camera with 200 MP and 50 MP sensors, with apertures of 2.4f, 2.2f, and 1.7f. Both models have a 50 MP front camera, but the Pro Max includes optical image stabilization (OIS) for the main camera, while the Ultra lacks this feature.

Both devices support video recording at 4320 x 30 fps, but the Ultra can also record at 4320 x 60 fps. They both offer phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus when recording movies, and HDR support, but the Pro Max has additional features like Dolby Vision recording, which the Ultra does not support. The Pro Max also has optical zoom at 5x, while the Ultra supports 4.3x optical zoom.

Additional similarities include both phones supporting slow-motion video recording, manual exposure, ISO adjustments, serial shot mode, manual focus, touch autofocus, panorama creation, timelapse, and the ability to shoot with a minimum focal length of 14-17 mm. Both devices lack 360° panorama shooting capabilities and front-facing LED flash, and neither features a dual-lens front camera. However, the Pro Max has a BSI sensor, while the Ultra does not, and the Ultra also lacks support for HDR10 and Dolby Vision recording.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra both run Android 16 and have very similar operating system features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and support theme customization. They also both offer the ability to block app tracking, use on-device machine learning, and manage notification permissions.

Both models support media pickers, dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing (although neither supports it), and battery health checks. They share features like dynamic theming, app offloading, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, and picture-in-picture (PiP) mode. Neither device receives direct OS updates, nor can they be used as a PC.

Additional shared features include a child lock, widgets support, offline voice recognition, voice commands, tracking the device's current position, multi-user support, and the ability to block cross-site tracking. Notably, both devices lack Quick Start and have no support for Mail Privacy Protection. Both devices are free and open-source as well.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra both come with rechargeable batteries, but there are some differences in their battery capacities and charging capabilities. The Pro Max has a larger battery with a capacity of 7500 mAh, compared to the Ultra's 6800 mAh battery. Both devices support wireless charging at 50W and fast charging, but the Pro Max offers faster wired charging at 100W, while the Ultra supports a slightly lower charging speed of 90W.

Both phones support reverse wireless charging, but the Pro Max supports faster reverse wireless charging at 22.5W, while the Ultra offers 10W reverse wireless charging. Neither device has a removable battery, but both include a battery level indicator and have rechargeable batteries.

In terms of features, both devices offer wireless charging, fast charging, and reverse wireless charging, but the Pro Max stands out with its higher charging speeds for both wired and reverse wireless charging.

Both the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra lack a 3.5 mm audio jack. However, they both feature stereo speakers for audio output. When it comes to audio technology, both phones support aptX, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, but neither supports LDAC or aptX Lossless.

Both devices also lack a radio feature. Overall, their audio specifications are quite similar, with no major differences between the two models in terms of supported audio technologies and features.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra are quite similar in terms of connectivity and features. Both support 5G, have Wi-Fi capabilities (including Wi-Fi 4, 5, 6, 6E, and Wi-Fi 7), and offer Bluetooth 5.4. They also feature USB Type-C with USB 3.2 support and NFC for wireless communication. Both phones support dual SIM cards and have the same download speed of 10,000 MBits/s and upload speed of 3,500 MBits/s.

Both devices come with a fingerprint scanner, GPS, a compass, and an accelerometer. They also have infrared sensors and a barometer. Both support Galileo positioning, have a gyroscope, and come with a cellular module. Notably, neither model has an HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, a built-in projector, or optical or motion tracking.

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra stands out with the inclusion of emergency SOS via satellite, a feature not present in the Pro Max. Both phones do not support external memory, crash detection, or ANT+, and neither has a heart rate monitor. They also lack DLNA certification and the ability to use a stylus.

Both the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17 Ultra feature a video light, which can be helpful for lighting in low-light environments. Neither device has sapphire glass display protection, a curved display, or an e-paper display. All these specifications are identical between the two models.

In summary, both phones offer similar features in this category, with no differences between them regarding the display or additional display-related technologies.