Xiaomi Poco C71 VS ZTE Blade A56

The Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 have some notable similarities in their design, but also key differences. Both phones weigh 193 g, so there’s no distinction in terms of weight. When it comes to dimensions, the Xiaomi Poco C71 is slightly taller at 171.8 mm compared to the ZTE Blade A56's 167.6 mm height. The width of the two devices is very close, with the Poco C71 measuring 77.8 mm and the Blade A56 at 77.4 mm. Both phones are 8.3 mm thick, showing no difference in thickness.

In terms of water resistance, the Xiaomi Poco C71 is water resistant, while the ZTE Blade A56 has no water resistance, marking a clear difference between the two. Both phones have a similar volume, with the Poco C71 at 110.94 cm³ and the Blade A56 at 107.67 cm³, with the Poco C71 being slightly larger.

Neither phone has a rugged build or the ability to fold, so these features are not present in either device.

The Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 have several similarities in their displays, though there are also some key differences. Both phones feature an LCD, IPS display with a pixel density of 260 ppi, ensuring similar clarity. However, the Poco C71 has a slightly larger screen size of 6.88″ compared to the 6.75″ display on the Blade A56. In terms of resolution, the Poco C71 offers 720 x 1640 px, while the Blade A56 has a slightly lower 720 x 1600 px resolution.

The refresh rate of the two devices also differs. The Poco C71 supports a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smoother scrolling and interaction, whereas the Blade A56 supports a 90Hz refresh rate. Both phones lack branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10, HDR10+, Always-On Display, and Dolby Vision support, meaning there are no differences in those features between the two.

Both phones do not have a secondary screen and feature a touch screen, so there are no differences in these aspects either.

The Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 feature similar internal storage options, both offering 128GB, though the Poco C71 comes with 6GB of RAM compared to the Blade A56's 4GB. In terms of performance, the Poco C71 is powered by the Unisoc T7250 chipset, while the Blade A56 uses the slightly lower-tier Unisoc T7200 chipset. The Poco C71 has a higher CPU speed, with its 2 x 1.8 GHz & 6 x 1.6 GHz configuration, compared to the Blade A56's 2 x 1.6 GHz & 6 x 1.6 GHz setup. This gives the Poco C71 a potential edge in processing power.

The Poco C71's Geekbench 6 scores reflect its stronger performance, with a multi-core score of 1461 and a single-core score of 437, compared to the Blade A56's multi-core score of 1391 and single-core score of 371. The Geekbench 5 results follow a similar trend, with the Poco C71 scoring 1350 in multi-core and 357 in single-core, while the Blade A56 scores 1175 in multi-core and 313 in single-core.

In terms of graphics, both phones are equipped with the Mali G57 GPU, but the Poco C71 has the Mali G57 with 2 execution units and a higher GPU clock speed of 850 MHz. The Blade A56's Mali G57 MP1 has 1 execution unit and a lower GPU clock speed of 650 MHz. The RAM speeds also differ, with the Poco C71's RAM running at 1866 MHz versus the Blade A56's 1600 MHz. Both phones have integrated LTE, support for 64-bit architecture, and have similar features like TrustZone, OpenCL version 2, and a thermal design power (TDP) of 10W.

The Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 offer similar front camera setups, both featuring an 8MP front camera. For the main camera, however, there is a notable difference in megapixels: the Poco C71 has a 32 MP main camera, while the Blade A56 has a 13 MP main camera. The Poco C71 also lacks a dual-lens or multi-lens main camera, while the Blade A56 features a dual-lens main camera.

Both phones support 1080 x 30 fps video recording, and neither has optical image stabilization or a dual-tone LED flash. Both phones have a single flash LED, a CMOS sensor, continuous autofocus when recording movies, slow-motion video recording, and support for a built-in HDR mode. Both also allow manual exposure, manual ISO, and manual focus, as well as offering serial shot mode and touch autofocus.

Other features such as the ability to create panoramas in-camera, manual white balance, and the absence of a front-facing LED flash or a front-facing camera under the display are similar across both models. Both phones lack features like HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, and 3D photo/video capabilities.

The Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 both run Android 15, offering a similar range of operating system features. Both phones include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. They also share features like theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, dark mode, and the ability to play games while they download. Both phones support offloading apps, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split screen. They also have PiP (Picture-in-Picture), child lock, and support for widgets, as well as being free and open-source.

There are no significant differences in the operating system capabilities between the two devices in terms of privacy, security, and user customization. Both phones lack Wi-Fi password sharing, Quick Start, and support for direct OS updates. Additionally, both have offline voice recognition and voice commands, as well as the ability to track the current position of a mobile device and support multi-user systems.

In summary, the Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 are equipped with identical operating system features, offering a comprehensive set of privacy, customization, and usability options.

The Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 have similar battery-related features, with both phones offering a rechargeable battery and a battery level indicator. The Poco C71 is equipped with a slightly larger 5200 mAh battery, while the Blade A56 comes with a 5000 mAh battery. Neither device supports wireless charging, and neither has a removable battery.

In terms of charging, both phones support fast charging, but the Poco C71 supports a faster charging speed of 15W compared to the 10W charging speed of the Blade A56. This means the Poco C71 can charge at a higher rate, although neither device offers wireless charging capability.

Overall, the battery capacities are similar, but the Poco C71 offers a higher charging speed, which could result in faster recharges compared to the Blade A56.

Both the Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 feature a 3.5 mm audio jack socket, allowing users to connect wired headphones or other audio accessories. Neither of the devices supports stereo speakers, so they both rely on single speaker output. When it comes to wireless audio technologies, neither phone supports aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, or LDAC, indicating they do not offer advanced high-quality wireless audio codecs.

However, both phones include an FM radio, which allows users to listen to radio broadcasts directly without the need for internet access.

In summary, the audio features on both devices are quite similar, with both offering a 3.5 mm audio jack, radio functionality, and no support for advanced wireless audio technologies or stereo speakers.

The Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 share several connectivity features but also have some key differences. Neither device supports 5G, but both offer Wi-Fi capabilities, with the Poco C71 supporting both Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), while the Blade A56 supports only Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n). The Poco C71 also offers dual SIM support, whereas the Blade A56 supports only a single SIM card.

Both phones feature Bluetooth 5.2, USB Type-C ports, and external memory slots. The Poco C71 has a faster download speed of 300 MBits/s and upload speed of 150 MBits/s compared to the Blade A56's 300 MBits/s download speed and 100 MBits/s upload speed. The Poco C71 also has NFC support, which the Blade A56 lacks.

In terms of sensors, both phones have a fingerprint scanner, GPS, accelerometer, and Galileo support. The Poco C71 includes a compass, while the Blade A56 does not. Neither phone supports features like 3D facial recognition, iris scanning, or infrared sensors, and both lack motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector. Additionally, both phones do not have a barometer, HDMI output, or emergency SOS via satellite.

Both the Xiaomi Poco C71 and ZTE Blade A56 come equipped with a video light, which can help enhance video recording in low-light conditions. Neither phone features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays. These features are absent from both devices, indicating that the display technology is standard in terms of durability and form factor.

In summary, the Poco C71 and Blade A56 are quite similar in terms of additional display features, offering a video light but lacking advanced display technologies like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.