Xiaomi Poco C85 4G VS Xiaomi Redmi 13x

Both the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and the Xiaomi Redmi 13x are water resistant, offering protection against water to some extent. The Poco C85 has an IP64 rating, while the Redmi 13x has a slightly lower IP53 rating, meaning the Poco C85 is more resistant to dust and water. When it comes to weight, the Poco C85 weighs 205 g, while the Redmi 13x is lighter at 198.5 g, making it a bit more manageable for users who prioritize weight.

In terms of size, the Poco C85 is slightly larger, with a height of 171.6 mm and a width of 79.5 mm, compared to the Redmi 13x's 168.6 mm height and 76.3 mm width. The Poco C85 also has a slightly larger volume, measuring 109.1376 cm³, compared to the Redmi 13x's 105.486276 cm³. However, the difference in size is minimal and might not be noticeable to most users.

Both phones are not designed to be rugged or foldable, so they offer standard designs without added durability features or foldability. The thickness is nearly identical, with the Poco C85 at 8 mm and the Redmi 13x at 8.2 mm, making them both slim devices.

The Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and Xiaomi Redmi 13x both feature IPS displays, but with some differences in key specifications. The Poco C85 has a slightly larger screen size of 6.9″, compared to the Redmi 13x's 6.79″. In terms of pixel density, the Redmi 13x offers a sharper display with 388 ppi, while the Poco C85 has a lower 254 ppi. This means the Redmi 13x may deliver slightly crisper visuals. Additionally, the Poco C85 has a resolution of 720 x 1600 px, whereas the Redmi 13x boasts a higher 1080 x 2400 px resolution, providing more detail in images and text.

When it comes to refresh rate, the Poco C85 stands out with a 120Hz refresh rate, making for smoother scrolling and gaming experiences, while the Redmi 13x has a 90Hz refresh rate, which is still good but not as fluid as the Poco C85. The Poco C85 also offers a higher typical brightness of 660 nits, compared to the 450 nits of the Redmi 13x. This suggests the Poco C85 may provide better visibility in bright environments.

Neither phone supports HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or has branded damage-resistant glass, and both feature touchscreens. Neither device offers an Always-On Display or a secondary screen, and neither model has any unique display durability enhancements.

Both the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and Xiaomi Redmi 13x offer similar performance specs, with the most notable difference being their chipsets. The Poco C85 is powered by the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Redmi 13x uses the slightly more advanced MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra. Both phones feature the Mali G52 GPU, but the Poco C85 has a GPU clock speed of 950 MHz, whereas the Redmi 13x’s GPU reaches 1000 MHz, providing a small advantage in graphics performance.

In terms of CPU, both phones use an octa-core setup with 2 high-performance cores running at 2.0 GHz and 6 power-efficient cores at 1.8 GHz. Both devices have 8 threads and share other common features like support for 64-bit, DirectX 12, and OpenGL 3.2. The Poco C85 achieves higher Geekbench 6 scores, with 1391 in multi-core performance and 420 in single-core, compared to the Redmi 13x’s 1274 and 341, respectively. This indicates the Poco C85 may offer slightly better overall processing power.

Both phones are equipped with 8GB of RAM, running at a speed of 1800 MHz, and feature 256GB of internal storage. The memory bandwidth is identical for both, with a maximum of 13.41 GB/s. Both devices also share the same thermal design power (5W), eMMC version (5.1), and support for GPU turbo. Both have 2 memory channels and a maximum memory amount of 8GB.

The Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and Xiaomi Redmi 13x differ significantly in their camera setups. The Poco C85 features a 50 MP main camera with a wide aperture of 1.8f, while the Redmi 13x has a dual-lens main camera with a 108 MP primary lens and a 2 MP secondary lens, with aperture values of 2.4f and 1.8f respectively. This means the Redmi 13x offers a more advanced camera system, capturing higher-resolution images with more flexibility in its setup. Both phones have a CMOS sensor, phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus for video, and support for slow-motion video recording.

For the front camera, the Poco C85 has an 8 MP camera, while the Redmi 13x has a higher resolution 16 MP front camera, allowing for potentially sharper selfies. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash, and both devices have similar features in terms of touch autofocus, HDR mode, and manual controls such as exposure, ISO, and white balance. Neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and neither can shoot raw photos.

Both phones can create panoramas in-camera and have a timelapse function, but neither can shoot 360° panoramas or 3D photos/videos. The Redmi 13x has a more powerful dual-tone LED flash with four LEDs, compared to the single LED flash on the Poco C85, which could result in a difference in flash performance in low-light conditions. Both devices do not have optical zoom or laser autofocus.

The Xiaomi Poco C85 4G runs on Android 15, while the Xiaomi Redmi 13x is equipped with Android 14. Both devices offer several similar operating system features, such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither device has Mail Privacy Protection or Wi-Fi password sharing, but both support dark mode, dynamic theming, and customizable notifications. The Poco C85 offers more flexibility by allowing apps to be offloaded, whereas the Redmi 13x does not have this feature.

Both phones come with additional useful features like on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and support for playing games while they download. They also share support for split screen, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), Live Text, full-page screenshots, sharing intents, a child lock, widgets, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and tracking the mobile device’s current position. Neither phone supports Quick Start or can be used as a PC.

Both devices are free and open source and feature multi-user systems. The Poco C85 has a battery health check and an extra dim mode, which is also present in the Redmi 13x. Both phones do not get direct OS updates, which means users may have to wait for system updates through other means.

The Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and Xiaomi Redmi 13x both feature rechargeable batteries, but with some differences in battery power. The Poco C85 has a larger 6000 mAh battery, while the Redmi 13x comes with a 5030 mAh battery. Despite this difference, both phones support fast charging at 33W and neither supports wireless charging. Both devices also feature a battery level indicator, which helps users track battery status, and neither has a removable battery.

Both phones are equipped with the same charging speed of 33W, ensuring that users can quickly recharge their devices. They also share the same feature of having a rechargeable battery, which is common in modern smartphones, and neither device has wireless charging capabilities.

In terms of battery power, the Poco C85 has a higher capacity, which could provide longer usage time, but both devices have similar fast-charging capabilities for efficient recharging.

Both the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and the Xiaomi Redmi 13x include a 3.5 mm audio jack, which is a common feature for wired audio connectivity. Neither device features stereo speakers, limiting their sound output to mono speakers. When it comes to audio codecs, the Poco C85 does not support any advanced aptX codecs, including aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. In contrast, the Redmi 13x supports aptX, providing enhanced audio quality for compatible Bluetooth devices.

Both phones include a built-in radio, allowing users to listen to FM radio stations without needing an internet connection. However, the Poco C85 lacks LDAC support, while the Redmi 13x also does not support LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, meaning both devices are similar in terms of high-resolution audio codec support.

Overall, the Xiaomi Poco C85 and the Xiaomi Redmi 13x have quite similar audio features, with the key difference being that the Redmi 13x supports aptX, which may appeal to users who value higher-quality wireless audio streaming.

Both the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and the Xiaomi Redmi 13x lack 5G support, and they share similar connectivity features. Both support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), allowing for fast wireless internet connections. They also both feature 2 SIM card slots, USB Type-C ports, and NFC support. Additionally, both devices have the same download speed of 300 MBits/s and upload speed of 100 MBits/s. The Poco C85 has Bluetooth version 5.4, while the Redmi 13x uses Bluetooth version 5.3, meaning the Poco C85 has slightly more advanced Bluetooth capabilities.

Both phones come with fingerprint scanners, support GPS, and have a compass, accelerometer, and a cellular module. The Poco C85, however, lacks a gyroscope, while the Redmi 13x includes this feature. Additionally, the Poco C85 does not have an infrared sensor, while the Redmi 13x does. Neither phone supports motion tracking, optical tracking, a built-in projector, or has a barometer or HDMI output.

Both devices support Galileo positioning and lack support for emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, 3D facial recognition, and iris scanners. Neither phone includes a stylus, and both phones do not support heart rate monitors or ANT+. Overall, the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and Xiaomi Redmi 13x offer comparable connectivity features, with the main differences being the inclusion of the gyroscope and infrared sensor on the Redmi 13x, as well as the Bluetooth version.

Both the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G and the Xiaomi Redmi 13x come equipped with a video light, allowing users to capture better-lit videos in low-light environments. Neither device features sapphire glass for the display, and both lack a curved display. Additionally, neither phone uses an e-paper display, which is often seen in devices focused on reading or power efficiency.

In terms of these miscellaneous features, both devices are identical, offering a video light for improved video recording and displaying conventional flat screens with typical glass protection.

Overall, there are no significant differences in this category between the two phones, as both offer the same set of features, including the video light and flat display design without sapphire glass or e-paper technology.