Xiaomi Poco F7 VS Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro

The Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro are both waterproof with an IP68 rating, ensuring that they can withstand water immersion to a certain depth and duration. In terms of physical dimensions, both devices share the same width (77.9 mm) and height (163.1 mm). However, the Poco F7 has a slightly thicker profile at 8.2 mm compared to the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro, which measures 8 mm in thickness.

Regarding weight, the Poco F7 is marginally lighter at 215.7 g, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro weighs 219 g. The Poco F7 also has a slightly larger volume at 104.19 cm³, whereas the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro comes in at 101.64 cm³. Despite these minor differences in weight and volume, both phones do not feature a rugged build and neither is foldable.

Overall, the design specifications for these two models are quite similar, with only small distinctions in weight, volume, and thickness. Both offer a sleek design with comparable dimensions, making them visually almost identical in terms of size and form factor.

Both the Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro feature OLED/AMOLED displays with the same screen size of 6.83″, pixel density of 447 ppi, and resolution of 1280 x 2772 px. They also share a 120Hz refresh rate and support HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, offering similar high-end display capabilities. Additionally, both devices have an Always-On Display and a touch screen.

However, there are some differences in display performance. The Poco F7 offers a touch sampling rate of 480Hz, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro significantly outperforms it with a 2560Hz touch sampling rate. In terms of brightness, the Poco F7 has a typical brightness of 700 nits, whereas the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is brighter with 1800 nits. The Poco F7 also includes branded damage-resistant glass, but this feature is absent from the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro.

Overall, while the two devices are quite similar in terms of display features, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has a higher touch sampling rate and brightness, but lacks the branded damage-resistant glass found on the Poco F7.

The Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro are powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, paired with the Adreno 825 GPU. Both devices feature a high CPU speed configuration with 3 x 3.01 GHz, 2 x 2.8 GHz, 2 x 2.02 GHz, and 1 x 3.21 GHz cores. They also share the same GPU clock speed of 1150 MHz, support for 64-bit, and utilize big.LITTLE technology with 8 CPU threads. Their RAM speed is also identical at 4800 MHz, and they both support multithreading.

In terms of memory, the Poco F7 comes with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of internal storage, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro offers 16GB of RAM and 1024GB of internal storage, doubling the storage capacity of the Poco F7. Both devices support up to 24GB of maximum memory and feature similar L2 and L3 caches (6MB and 8MB, respectively). The Poco F7 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 2,084,535, whereas the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro scores higher at 2,406,698. Additionally, the Poco F7 scores 6833 in Geekbench 6’s multi-core test and 2041 in the single-core test, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has slightly higher scores of 6880 (multi-core) and 2154 (single-core).

Overall, both devices share many performance features, with the main difference being the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro’s superior RAM, storage, and benchmark scores, offering a more powerful configuration compared to the Poco F7.

Both the Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro feature a dual-lens main camera setup with 50 MP and 8 MP lenses, and have a wide aperture of 2.2f and 1.5f for the two lenses. The front camera on both devices is 20 MP with a wide aperture of 2.2f. Both phones offer similar features such as built-in optical image stabilization, continuous autofocus for videos, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and support for slow-motion video recording. Additionally, both devices have a built-in HDR mode, manual exposure, and support for creating panoramas in-camera.

One key difference is in the number of flash LEDs: the Poco F7 has two, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has three flash LEDs. The Poco F7 also offers RAW image shooting, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro does not. Both devices lack a dual-tone LED flash, front-facing LED flash, and RGB LED flash, and neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Both devices are also without a front-facing camera under the display and do not offer 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Overall, the camera systems of the two devices are very similar, with the main difference being the additional flash LED on the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and the RAW image support on the Poco F7.

Both the Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro run on Android 15, offering a similar set of features such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. Both devices support theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, and a media picker. They also have dark mode, battery health checks, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, app offloading, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, and Picture-in-Picture (PiP) mode.

There are some differences between the two devices. The Poco F7 supports Wi-Fi password sharing, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro does not. Additionally, the Poco F7 has a child lock, offline voice recognition, and voice commands, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has no mention of child lock. Both devices track the current position of a mobile device and are multi-user systems, but neither device supports Quick Start. Both are free and open-source systems and do not get direct OS updates.

Overall, the operating systems of the two devices are highly similar, with the Poco F7 offering slightly more features, particularly around Wi-Fi password sharing and child lock functionality.

The Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro both feature fast charging support at 90W, but differ in battery size. The Poco F7 is equipped with a 6500 mAh battery, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has a larger 7550 mAh battery. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have non-removable, rechargeable batteries. Both devices also include a battery level indicator.

A key difference between the two devices is that the Poco F7 does not come with a charger, whereas the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro does come with a charger in the box. Both phones support fast charging but do not include removable batteries.

Overall, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro offers a larger battery and includes a charger in the box, the Poco F7 has a smaller battery but shares similar fast-charging capabilities.

Both the Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, but both feature stereo speakers for audio output. The Poco F7 offers a broader range of audio codec support with aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, though it does not support aptX Lossless. In contrast, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro supports aptX but does not have LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, making its audio capabilities slightly more limited compared to the Poco F7.

Neither device supports a radio, so users will need to rely on streaming or other methods for radio access. Despite both lacking the 3.5 mm jack, the stereo speakers and aptX support ensure good audio performance on both devices, with the Poco F7 offering a more comprehensive set of audio enhancements.

Overall, while both phones have stereo speakers and aptX support, the Poco F7 offers more advanced audio features, such as LDAC and aptX HD, compared to the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro.

The Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro share many connectivity features, such as 5G support, dual SIM cards, NFC, USB Type-C, and similar Wi-Fi support (Wi-Fi 4, 5, 6, and 7). Both devices also support Bluetooth, though the Poco F7 is equipped with Bluetooth version 6, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro has version 5.4. Both devices have a fingerprint scanner, a gyroscope, GPS, a compass, an infrared sensor, an accelerometer, and a cellular module.

In terms of speed, both devices offer the same download speed of 4200 MBits/s and upload speed of 3500 MBits/s. Neither device supports an external memory slot or features emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or motion tracking. Both phones also lack a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, a stylus, optical tracking, and a built-in projector. They both support Galileo for positioning.

While the connectivity features are largely similar, the main difference lies in the Bluetooth version, with the Poco F7 having a newer version (Bluetooth 6) compared to the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro's Bluetooth 5.4. Other than that, both devices offer comparable functionality in terms of wireless and sensor capabilities.

Both the Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro come equipped with a video light, enhancing their capabilities for low-light video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, indicating that their designs are more traditional in terms of screen technology and shape.

Overall, both phones are identical in terms of these additional features, with neither offering any special display technologies like sapphire glass or curved displays. The main unique feature on both models is the inclusion of a video light, which can be useful for recording in dark environments.

In conclusion, the Xiaomi Poco F7 and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro share the same set of miscellaneous features, with no major differences between them in this category.