Xiaomi Poco F7 VS ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro

In terms of physical form, the Poco F7 is the more compact and lighter device. At 215.7 g and 8.2 mm thick, it is noticeably lighter than the Red Magic 11 Pro's 230 g and 8.9 mm profile. That 14-gram difference may seem minor on paper, but during extended one-handed use or gaming sessions, it translates into a meaningfully less fatiguing experience. The smaller total volume — 104.2 cm³ versus 111.5 cm³ — confirms the Poco F7 is the more pocketable of the two, despite having a slightly wider frame.

On protection, both phones achieve an IPX8-level water resistance rating, meaning submersion in water up to a defined depth is covered. However, the Poco F7 carries a full IP68 certification, which adds a verified dust-resistance rating on top of the water protection. The Red Magic 11 Pro's IPX8 designation leaves dust ingress officially unrated — not necessarily a gap in real-world protection, but a weaker formal guarantee. Neither device is built to a rugged standard, so neither is suited for harsh outdoor or industrial environments.

Overall, the Poco F7 holds a clear edge in design for this group: it is lighter, slimmer, and carries a more complete IP certification. For users who prioritize comfort during long hold times and want broader environmental protection guarantees, the Poco F7 is the stronger choice here.

Both screens are OLED/AMOLED panels of nearly identical size — 6.83″ on the Poco F7 versus 6.85″ on the Red Magic 11 Pro — so the viewing experience starts from a very similar baseline. Where they diverge meaningfully is in sharpness versus motion fluidity. The Poco F7 resolves a higher 447 ppi pixel density compared to the Red Magic's 431 ppi, which means slightly crisper text and finer detail at close range. The Red Magic 11 Pro counters with a 144Hz refresh rate against the Poco F7's 120Hz, delivering smoother on-screen motion — a tangible advantage in fast-paced gaming and fluid scrolling that is precisely the audience this phone targets.

The HDR story clearly favors the Poco F7. It supports HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision — three of the major high dynamic range standards — meaning compatible content from streaming platforms will render with richer contrast and more accurate color tone mapping. The Red Magic 11 Pro supports none of these standards, which is a notable omission for a premium device, particularly for users who consume a lot of video content.

Weighing the two, the result depends on use case. For gaming, the Red Magic 11 Pro's 144Hz refresh rate is a genuine differentiator. For everything else — media consumption, general sharpness, and display standards compliance — the Poco F7 holds the broader advantage, with superior pixel density and comprehensive HDR support giving it a more well-rounded display profile.

The chipset gap here is substantial. The Poco F7 runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 — a capable but cost-optimized derivative — while the Red Magic 11 Pro is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Qualcomm's flagship-tier silicon. The Geekbench 6 scores make the delta concrete: the Red Magic 11 Pro posts a multi-core result of 10,059 versus the Poco F7's 6,833, and the single-core gap is equally wide at 3,234 versus 2,041. In practice, this translates to faster app launches, smoother handling of demanding workloads, and greater headroom for compute-intensive tasks like video rendering or high-fidelity gaming.

The supporting hardware reinforces this advantage. The Red Magic 11 Pro pairs its chip with 24 GB of RAM at 5300 MHz and a memory bandwidth of 85.1 GB/s, compared to the Poco F7's 12 GB at 4800 MHz and 76.8 GB/s. More RAM at higher speed means the system can hold more active processes and feed the CPU and GPU data faster — a meaningful edge for multitasking and sustained gaming performance. The 1 TB of internal storage on the Red Magic also doubles what the Poco F7 offers. Perhaps most telling is the thermal efficiency story: the Red Magic 11 Pro achieves all of this at a lower TDP of 8.2W versus the Poco F7's 12.5W, thanks to its more advanced 3 nm manufacturing process — meaning it runs cooler and more efficiently under load despite being far more powerful.

The Red Magic 11 Pro wins this category decisively. Across raw CPU throughput, memory configuration, and power efficiency, it outclasses the Poco F7 at every level. The Poco F7's 8s Gen 4 is a solid mid-to-upper-tier performer, but it is simply not in the same class as the flagship silicon driving the Red Magic.

Starting with the rear system, the Red Magic 11 Pro fields a triple-camera setup — 50 MP + 50 MP + 2 MP — against the Poco F7's dual-camera configuration of 50 MP + 8 MP. The extra 50 MP lens on the Red Magic adds a second high-resolution shooter to the array, providing far more flexibility in coverage compared to the Poco F7's lower-resolution secondary. Aperture also favors the Red Magic on the primary lens: its f/1.9 main aperture is wider than the Poco F7's f/2.2, which means more light reaches the sensor in low-light conditions — typically resulting in brighter, less noisy shots without flash.

The most dramatic gap is in video capability. The Red Magic 11 Pro tops out at 4320p at 30 fps — full 8K recording — while the Poco F7 maxes out at 2160p at 60 fps. For users who prioritize maximum video resolution, the Red Magic holds a clear lead. The Poco F7 does offer higher frame rate at 4K, which is preferable for smoother motion footage at that resolution, so the tradeoff depends on whether resolution or fluidity matters more. Both phones support OIS, phase-detection autofocus, and slow-motion recording, so the fundamentals are well matched.

On the front camera, the Poco F7 flips the script slightly with a 20 MP selfie shooter versus the Red Magic's 16 MP, giving it a modest edge for self-portraits. Overall, though, the Red Magic 11 Pro has the stronger camera package — its triple rear system, wider main aperture, and 8K video capability collectively represent a more versatile and capable rear imaging setup.

The software landscape between these two phones is remarkably uniform — across privacy controls, productivity features, and core Android capabilities, they are functionally identical. The one version difference does stand out, however: the Red Magic 11 Pro ships with Android 16 while the Poco F7 launches on Android 15. A newer Android version means access to the latest platform security patches, API improvements, and any system-level enhancements Google introduced in that release cycle — a modest but real advantage out of the box.

The only other differentiator in the provided data cuts the other way: the Poco F7 supports Wi-Fi password sharing, while the Red Magic 11 Pro does not. This is a small but genuinely convenient feature for households and users who regularly onboard new devices or guests onto a network without having to manually look up or type credentials.

Taken together, this is a near-tie. The Red Magic 11 Pro holds a slight edge due to its newer OS version, which carries broader long-term implications for security and compatibility. The Poco F7's Wi-Fi password sharing perk is useful but too narrow to shift the overall balance.

Raw capacity tells a clear story here. The Red Magic 11 Pro packs a 7500 mAh battery — 1000 mAh more than the Poco F7's already generous 6500 mAh cell. Both are well above the typical flagship range, but the extra capacity on the Red Magic is meaningful for a device built around sustained gaming sessions, where screen brightness, CPU, and GPU are all under continuous load. More mAh under those conditions translates directly into longer uninterrupted play time before reaching for a cable.

Charging speed is nearly a wash, with the Poco F7 holding a marginal lead at 90W versus the Red Magic's 80W. In practice, the Poco F7 will replenish faster from empty — but since it also has a smaller battery to fill, the real-world time-to-full figures are likely to be close. The more meaningful differentiator is the Red Magic 11 Pro's support for wireless charging, a convenience feature the Poco F7 lacks entirely. For users who prefer the ease of a charging pad on a desk or nightstand, this is a genuine quality-of-life advantage.

Across both key dimensions — endurance and charging versatility — the Red Magic 11 Pro has the stronger battery package. Its larger capacity supports longer use between charges, and wireless charging adds a flexibility option that the Poco F7 simply cannot match.

These two phones take opposite approaches to audio connectivity, and which one suits a user better comes down entirely to how they listen. The Red Magic 11 Pro includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack — a feature the Poco F7 drops entirely — making it the straightforward choice for anyone with a collection of wired headphones or earphones who prefers the simplicity and zero-latency reliability of a physical connection. Both devices offer stereo speakers for media playback, so on-device audio output is on equal footing.

Where the Poco F7 asserts itself is in wireless audio quality. It supports aptX, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive — a full stack of Qualcomm's high-quality Bluetooth audio codecs — while the Red Magic 11 Pro supports none of them. aptX Adaptive in particular is the current flagship codec, capable of dynamically adjusting bitrate and delivering low-latency, high-resolution wireless audio to compatible headphones. For users invested in premium Bluetooth audio gear, the Poco F7 offers a substantially richer wireless listening experience.

This category is a genuine split based on use case. The Red Magic 11 Pro serves wired audio users better with its headphone jack, while the Poco F7 holds the clear edge for wireless audio quality through its comprehensive aptX codec support. Neither phone dominates outright, but users without wired headphone dependencies will find the Poco F7's wireless audio credentials considerably more capable.

Three connectivity differences stand out from an otherwise near-identical feature set. First, the Poco F7 equips the newer Bluetooth 6, compared to the Red Magic 11 Pro's Bluetooth 5.4. The latest Bluetooth generation brings improvements in connection precision and efficiency — a meaningful edge for users pairing wireless peripherals or audio devices. Second, the Red Magic 11 Pro adds Wi-Fi 6E support alongside the shared Wi-Fi 7 capability, giving it access to the less congested 6 GHz band — useful in dense environments where the standard 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz channels are crowded.

The most impactful gap, however, is in wired connectivity. The Red Magic 11 Pro uses USB 3.2, while the Poco F7 is limited to USB 2.0. For day-to-day charging this makes no practical difference, but for file transfers — moving large game assets, videos, or backups to a PC — USB 3.2 is dramatically faster. This also aligns with the Red Magic's dramatically higher cellular download ceiling of 10,000 Mbits/s versus the Poco F7's 4,200 Mbits/s, reflecting its flagship modem's broader throughput potential on compatible 5G networks.

The result here is a split with a lean. The Poco F7 wins on Bluetooth version, but the Red Magic 11 Pro's advantages in USB 3.2 transfer speeds and cellular download throughput are higher-impact differentiators for a power user. The Red Magic 11 Pro holds the overall connectivity edge in this group, particularly for users who frequently move large files or demand maximum network performance.

The miscellaneous specs for these two devices are identical across every data point provided. Both include a video light, and neither features a sapphire glass display, a curved screen, or an e-paper panel. There is simply nothing in this group that separates them.

This is a complete tie — no advantage can be assigned to either the Poco F7 or the Red Magic 11 Pro based on the available data here. Users should weigh the other specification groups to inform their decision.