Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G VS ZTE Blade A76

The Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and the ZTE Blade A76 both feature water resistance, but the Xiaomi device has an IP64 Ingress Protection rating, while the ZTE device has a slightly lower IP54 rating. This suggests the Xiaomi model may offer slightly better protection against dust and water ingress.

In terms of physical size, the Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G is slightly larger, measuring 171.6 mm in height, 79.5 mm in width, and 8 mm in thickness. The ZTE Blade A76, on the other hand, is a bit more compact with a height of 163.3 mm, width of 74.8 mm, and thickness of 8.2 mm. Despite the ZTE being slimmer by 0.2 mm, the Xiaomi is larger in overall dimensions.

The weight of the two devices is almost identical, with the Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G weighing 205 g and the ZTE Blade A76 at 203 g. The difference is minimal and unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use. The Xiaomi also has a slightly larger volume, 109.14 cm³ compared to the ZTE's 100.16 cm³, reflecting its larger physical size.

The Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and the ZTE Blade A76 both feature LCD, IPS displays. The screen sizes differ slightly, with the Xiaomi offering a 6.9″ display, while the ZTE has a 6.75″ screen. The Xiaomi's larger screen may offer a more expansive viewing area, though the difference is modest.

In terms of resolution, the Xiaomi has a 720 x 1600 px display, whereas the ZTE has a resolution of 720 x 1612 px. The difference in resolution is minimal, with the ZTE's slightly higher pixel count likely offering a marginally sharper image.

The Xiaomi device supports a higher refresh rate of 120Hz compared to the ZTE's 90Hz, which may result in a smoother visual experience on the Xiaomi, especially during fast scrolling or gaming. On the other hand, neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or has an Always-On Display, and neither has a secondary screen. The Xiaomi, however, does have branded damage-resistant glass, while the ZTE does not include this feature.

The Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and ZTE Blade A76 differ significantly in terms of internal storage, RAM, and processing power. The Xiaomi comes with 256GB of internal storage and 4GB of RAM, while the ZTE has half the internal storage at 128GB but offers 6GB of RAM. Both devices support 64-bit architecture, but the Xiaomi has a higher RAM speed of 1800 MHz compared to the ZTE's 2133 MHz.

When it comes to the chipset, the Xiaomi features the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, which has a maximum CPU speed of 2 x 2 GHz and 6 x 1.8 GHz cores. The ZTE, on the other hand, uses the Unisoc Tanggula T760, with a CPU speed of 4 x 2.2 GHz and 4 x 1.8 GHz cores. The ZTE's chipset offers higher peak speeds but fewer cores at the higher frequency. Additionally, the Xiaomi has a GPU turbo speed of 950 MHz, while the ZTE has a slightly lower 650 MHz turbo speed.

In benchmarking performance, the Xiaomi achieves a Geekbench 5 multi-core score of 1300 and a single-core score of 350. The ZTE significantly outperforms the Xiaomi with a multi-core score of 2155 and a single-core score of 541. Both phones support DirectX 12, OpenGL ES version 3.2, and have integrated LTE, integrated graphics, TrustZone, and OpenCL version 2. The Xiaomi has a maximum memory capacity of 8GB, while the ZTE can support up to 32GB of RAM.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and ZTE Blade A76 feature a 50 MP main camera with a wide aperture of 1.8f. However, the ZTE Blade A76 has a dual-lens main camera, while the Xiaomi only has a single-lens setup. The front cameras are both 8 MP, and neither device has a front-facing LED flash or a dual-lens front camera.

When it comes to video recording, the Xiaomi supports 1080 x 30 fps, while the ZTE offers a higher 2160 x 30 fps resolution. Both phones support slow-motion video recording, continuous autofocus, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and HDR video capabilities, but neither supports HDR10 recording or Dolby Vision recording.

Both devices share several common camera features, including manual exposure, manual ISO, manual white balance, serial shot mode, touch autofocus, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Neither phone has optical zoom, a BSI sensor, a front-facing camera under the display, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities. Additionally, neither device features built-in optical image stabilization or laser autofocus.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and ZTE Blade A76 run on Android 15 and share a range of privacy and security features, including clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither device includes Mail Privacy Protection or cross-site tracking blocking.

For customization, both phones support theme customization, dynamic theming, and dark mode. They also offer customizable notifications, a media picker, and the ability to offload apps. Features like PiP (Picture in Picture) and Live Text are available on both devices, as well as full-page screenshots and split-screen support. Neither phone supports Wi-Fi password sharing or the Quick Start feature.

Both phones support offline voice recognition, voice commands, and a child lock. They can track the current position of the device and are multi-user systems. Additionally, both phones support widgets and are free and open source. The Xiaomi does not receive direct OS updates, and the ZTE has the same limitation. Neither device offers the ability to be used as a PC.

The Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G has a larger 6000 mAh battery compared to the ZTE Blade A76, which has a 5000 mAh battery. Neither device supports wireless charging or reverse wireless charging, and both have rechargeable batteries that are not removable.

Both phones feature a battery level indicator, so users can easily monitor the charge. However, the Xiaomi device supports fast charging, while the ZTE does not. This means the Xiaomi may charge more quickly compared to the ZTE, though both phones lack wireless charging capabilities.

In summary, while the Xiaomi has a larger battery and supports fast charging, the ZTE's battery is slightly smaller and lacks fast charging support. Both phones share similar battery-related features, such as the lack of a removable battery and rechargeable battery types.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and ZTE Blade A76 include a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing for wired audio connections. Neither device is equipped with stereo speakers, which means audio will be delivered through single-channel speakers instead.

In terms of advanced audio technologies, neither phone supports aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, or LDAC. This means both devices lack support for high-quality Bluetooth audio streaming options and focus solely on standard audio features.

Overall, the audio capabilities of both phones are quite similar, with the main feature being the inclusion of a 3.5 mm audio jack and a lack of support for premium audio technologies or stereo speakers.

The Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and ZTE Blade A76 differ in terms of 5G support. The Xiaomi does not support 5G, while the ZTE includes 5G support. Both devices offer Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) support, along with dual SIM card slots.

In terms of Bluetooth, both phones feature Bluetooth version 5.4. The Xiaomi has an external memory slot, but the ZTE does not. Both phones include USB Type-C with USB version 2 support, NFC, a fingerprint scanner, and GPS. Neither device has emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or a barometer, and neither is DLNA-certified.

Both devices have similar sensors, including a gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass. Neither phone supports ANT+, has an infrared sensor, or includes a stylus. Both devices support Galileo, and neither includes 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, motion tracking, optical tracking, or a built-in projector.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G and ZTE Blade A76 come with a video light, allowing for better lighting during video recordings. Neither device features sapphire glass for the display, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

In summary, the video light is the standout common feature between these two devices in this category, while other display enhancements like sapphire glass, curved displays, and e-paper displays are absent in both models.

There are no differences in the miscellaneous features between the two phones beyond the shared specifications.