Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G VS Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro both share an IP68 Ingress Protection rating, meaning they are resistant to dust and can withstand submersion in water. However, the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G does not have any specified water resistance, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is described as waterproof, which indicates a stronger emphasis on water protection.

In terms of dimensions, the two devices are quite similar in height and width, with the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G measuring 163.3 mm tall and 78.3 mm wide, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is slightly smaller at 163.1 mm tall and 77.9 mm wide. The weight of the two phones is also close, with the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G weighing 211 g and the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro weighing 219 g, making the Turbo 4 Pro a little heavier.

The thickness and volume of the devices are also comparable, with the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G being 7.9 mm thick and having a volume of 101.01 cm³, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is just slightly thicker at 8 mm and has a volume of 101.64 cm³, meaning the difference in size and thickness is minimal.

The displays of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro are both OLED/AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep contrasts. The screen size is identical on both devices at 6.83″, providing a large and immersive viewing experience.

There are slight differences in pixel density, with the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G offering 443 ppi and the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro slightly higher at 447 ppi. Both displays feature a resolution of 1220 x 2772 px and support high refresh rates of 120Hz, ensuring smooth visuals. The touch sampling rate is notably higher on the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro at 2560Hz, compared to 240Hz on the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G.

In terms of durability, the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G has branded damage-resistant glass, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro lacks this feature. Both phones support HDR10 and HDR10+ for enhanced dynamic range, as well as Dolby Vision for superior color accuracy. Additionally, both devices include an Always-On Display feature, and neither has a secondary screen.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro are both equipped with 1024GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, providing ample space and memory for most users. However, they differ in several key performance areas. The Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chipset, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is powered by the more advanced Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset.

In terms of CPU performance, the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G has a configuration of 1 core at 2.7 GHz, 3 cores at 2.4 GHz, and 4 cores at 1.8 GHz, totaling 8 threads. The Redmi Turbo 4 Pro, on the other hand, has a higher clock speed with 3 cores at 3.01 GHz, 2 cores at 2.8 GHz, 2 cores at 2.02 GHz, and 1 core at 3.21 GHz, also with 8 threads. This suggests that the Turbo 4 Pro's CPU may offer higher performance under heavy loads.

The RAM speed is another area where the two devices differ significantly. The Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G offers 3200 MHz RAM, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro comes with a faster 4800 MHz RAM. Additionally, the Turbo 4 Pro has a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s compared to the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G's 25.6 GB/s, which could result in better overall data transfer performance. The Turbo 4 Pro also supports up to 24GB of RAM, while the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G is capped at 16GB. Finally, the TDP of the Turbo 4 Pro is 12.5W, which is higher than the 5W TDP of the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G, suggesting a higher power consumption for the Turbo 4 Pro's more powerful components.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro both feature dual-lens main cameras, though their configurations differ slightly. The Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G combines a 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP setup, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro offers a 50 MP + 8 MP combination. Both phones support a variety of camera features, such as phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus for video, and slow-motion recording.

When it comes to video recording, the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G captures at 2160 x 30 fps, whereas the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro can record at a higher 2160 x 60 fps. The front-facing cameras are also different, with the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G featuring a 32 MP front camera, while the Turbo 4 Pro has a 20 MP front camera. Neither phone includes a front-facing LED flash, but both devices offer features like touch autofocus and the ability to create in-camera panoramas. Both phones also support timelapse functions and have manual controls for exposure, ISO, and white balance.

In terms of flash, the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G uses a single flash LED, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is equipped with three flash LEDs. Neither phone supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both lack the ability to shoot in 360° panorama mode or capture raw images. Overall, both phones offer a wide range of camera features but differ in some specifics, like front camera megapixels and video recording capabilities.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro run Android 15, providing a similar software experience across both devices. They share a wide array of privacy and customization features, including clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Neither device includes Mail Privacy Protection or supports Wi-Fi password sharing.

In terms of functionality, both phones offer on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, dark mode, and battery health checks. They also feature an extra dim mode, dynamic theming, offload apps, and customizable notifications. Both devices include Live Text, full-page screenshots, PiP (Picture in Picture), support for split screen, and the ability to track the current position of the device. They also have voice commands, offline voice recognition, sharing intents, a child lock, widgets, and are multi-user systems.

Despite the similarities, there are a few areas where both devices are the same, such as the lack of a Quick Start feature. Additionally, both phones receive OS updates indirectly, as neither gets direct OS updates. Overall, the operating system experience on both devices is highly similar, with no major differences in the provided features.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro both feature large batteries, with the Note 15 Pro Plus 5G housing a 7000 mAh battery and the Turbo 4 Pro offering a slightly larger 7550 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging at 90W, but neither supports wireless charging. Additionally, both phones have non-removable, rechargeable batteries and include a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily track battery status.

Despite the differences in battery capacity, both phones share similar charging features, including the support for fast charging and rechargeable batteries. The main distinction here is the slightly larger battery in the Turbo 4 Pro, which may provide a marginally longer battery life under similar usage conditions.

Overall, the battery specs of both devices are quite similar, with only the minor difference in capacity separating the two models.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. Both devices come with stereo speakers, providing enhanced audio output. The key difference between the two is in the wireless audio technology supported.

The Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G supports LDAC for high-quality Bluetooth audio streaming but does not include aptX or any of its variants (HD, Adaptive, or Lossless). On the other hand, the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro supports aptX, which is known for delivering improved audio quality over standard Bluetooth, but it does not support LDAC.

In summary, both phones offer stereo speakers and advanced Bluetooth audio support, but the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G focuses on LDAC, while the Redmi Turbo 4 Pro supports aptX. Neither supports the other’s Bluetooth audio standard, and neither includes the 3.5 mm audio jack.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro support 5G connectivity and have dual SIM slots. Both devices also support NFC, include USB Type-C ports, and offer Bluetooth version 5.4. Their Wi-Fi capabilities are similar, supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), with the Turbo 4 Pro having the added advantage of supporting Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) as well.

In terms of download speeds, the Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G reaches a maximum of 2900 Mbit/s, while the Turbo 4 Pro offers a faster 4200 Mbit/s. Both devices include similar sensors, including a gyroscope, accelerometer, compass, infrared sensor, GPS, and support for Galileo. Neither device includes a barometer or HDMI output. Both phones have fingerprint scanners for security and lack advanced biometric features like 3D facial recognition or iris scanners.

Additional features such as a heart rate monitor, ANT+ support, motion tracking, optical tracking, and a built-in projector are not available on either device. Both phones also lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, and DLNA certification. Overall, the two devices are very similar in terms of connectivity and features, with the main differences being the Wi-Fi 7 support and faster download speed of the Turbo 4 Pro.

Both the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro come equipped with a video light, which can be useful for capturing images or videos in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning both phones have standard glass screens without the specialized features associated with these technologies.

In summary, the miscellaneous features of both phones are nearly identical, with both having a video light but lacking advanced display options such as sapphire glass, curved screens, or e-paper displays.

There are no significant differences in this category between the two models.