Xiaomi TV A 2026 65" VS Xiaomi TV A Pro 2026 65"

Both the Xiaomi TV A 2026 65″ and the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2026 65″ share a strong common foundation: identical 4K (3840 x 2160) resolution at 68 ppi, a 10-bit panel capable of rendering over a billion colors, a 60Hz refresh rate, and matching 178° viewing angles in both directions. Both also include an anti-reflection coating and an ambient light sensor, which are practical everyday features that improve watchability in varied lighting conditions.

The single but meaningful differentiator lies in the panel technology and HDR support. The A Pro upgrades to a QLED panel, while the standard A uses a conventional LED-backlit LCD. QLED's quantum dot layer typically delivers higher peak brightness and more saturated, accurate colors — a tangible improvement for vivid content in well-lit rooms. On the HDR side, the A Pro adds support for HDR10+, the dynamic metadata upgrade to HDR10, which allows scene-by-scene brightness optimization for compatible content. The standard A is limited to HDR10 and HLG only. Neither model supports Dolby Vision.

The Xiaomi TV A Pro 2026 65″ holds a clear display advantage. Its QLED technology and HDR10+ support represent genuine, real-world improvements in color volume and HDR fidelity over the standard A model — especially relevant for users who watch HDR-mastered streaming content or want more vibrant picture quality out of the box.

Connectivity is one area where these two televisions are in complete lockstep. Every single spec — from HDMI 2.1 ports (3 of them) and a single USB port, to Bluetooth 5, Wi-Fi 5, and a wired RJ45 ethernet port — is identical across the Xiaomi TV A 2026 65″ and the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2026 65″.

The shared feature set is reasonably well-rounded for a TV in this segment. HDMI 2.1 supports 4K at high frame rates, which is relevant for console gaming. Wi-Fi 5 covers the vast majority of home network needs, and the inclusion of a wired ethernet port is a practical bonus for users who prioritize a stable streaming connection. Miracast support adds wireless screen mirroring from compatible devices, and the 3.5mm audio jack allows direct headphone or audio system connections without an adapter.

With no differences whatsoever between the two models in this category, connectivity is a complete tie. Neither product has any advantage here, and this group should carry no weight in a buying decision between the two.

Audio is another category where the Xiaomi TV A 2026 65″ and the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2026 65″ are perfectly matched. Both deliver 2 x 10W stereo output — adequate for casual viewing in a typical living room, though unlikely to fill a large space with authority. Neither model includes a subwoofer, which is standard for flat-panel TVs at this tier.

On the format support side, both share an identical codec lineup: Dolby Audio and DTS:X are present, while Dolby Atmos and Dolby Virtual are absent on both. The inclusion of HDMI eARC alongside standard ARC is a practical highlight — eARC supports lossless audio passthrough to a compatible soundbar or AV receiver, meaning users who invest in external audio hardware will get the most out of their setup regardless of which model they choose.

There is nothing to separate these two televisions on audio. Every specification is identical, making this a clear tie — audio performance should play no role in choosing between the A and A Pro.

From a physical standpoint, the Xiaomi TV A 2026 65″ and the Xiaomi TV A Pro 2026 65″ are indistinguishable. Both measure 1445 x 833 x 75 mm and weigh exactly 13 kg, meaning installation effort, furniture requirements, and wall-mount planning are identical for either model.

The shared VESA mount compatibility is a useful practical note — both can be taken off their stands and mounted on a wall without any additional adapter. Operating temperature range (0–40 °C) is the same as well, placing both firmly in standard indoor-use territory with no edge cases for either.

Design and dimensions result in a complete tie. There is no physical or ergonomic reason to prefer one over the other, and buyers should look entirely to other specification groups — particularly display and features — to guide their decision.

Feature-for-feature, these two televisions are nearly identical. Both run a full smart TV platform with Google Assistant voice control, Chromecast built-in, and AirPlay support — a strong cross-ecosystem combination that covers Android, iOS, and most streaming workflows without any additional hardware. USB recording, smartphone remote support, and practical utilities like sleep timer and child lock are all present on both models.

The one measurable difference in this group is operating power consumption: the A Pro draws 180W under load compared to the A's 150W. That 30W gap is directly attributable to the QLED panel's higher brightness demands. Over long daily viewing hours, this difference does add up on an electricity bill — though standby consumption is an identical 0.5W on both, so the gap only matters during active use.

On smart features alone, this is effectively a tie — the A Pro offers nothing extra in terms of platform, voice assistant ecosystem, or usability tools. The only distinction, higher power draw, is a minor point in the A's favor for energy-conscious buyers, though it is a direct consequence of the A Pro's superior display technology rather than any inefficiency.