Xiaomi TV F 2026 65" VS Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026 75"

Both the Xiaomi TV F 2026 65″ and the Xiaomi TV S Pro Mini LED 2026 75″ share the same core resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160 px), 10-bit color depth, and 1.07 billion displayable colors, making them evenly matched on raw image detail. The notable size difference does, however, flip pixel density: the smaller F 2026 delivers 68 ppi versus the S Pro's 59 ppi, meaning the F 2026 produces a marginally sharper image per inch — though at typical living-room viewing distances this difference is rarely perceptible.

The most meaningful display differentiators lie in backlighting technology and motion handling. The S Pro adds a Mini-LED layer to its QLED panel, enabling far more precise local dimming zones than the F 2026's conventional LED backlight. In practice, this translates to deeper blacks, brighter highlights, and significantly reduced blooming around bright objects on dark backgrounds — a real advantage for HDR content. Speaking of HDR, the S Pro supports Dolby Vision and HDR10+ in addition to the HDR10 and HLG formats both TVs share. Since Dolby Vision and HDR10+ carry dynamic, scene-by-scene metadata, they extract noticeably better contrast and color from compatible streaming content compared to the static-metadata HDR10 that is the F 2026's ceiling.

On motion performance, the gap is equally stark: the S Pro's 144Hz native refresh rate versus the F 2026's 60Hz is a decisive edge for sports, gaming, and fast-paced action content, where smoother frame rendering and lower input lag matter. Shared features — anti-reflection coating, ambient light sensor, and identical 178° viewing angles — keep both TVs competitive on fundamentals. Overall, the S Pro Mini LED 2026 holds a clear and substantial display advantage, driven by its Mini-LED backlight, broader HDR ecosystem support, and high-refresh-rate panel; the F 2026 65″ is a capable but more entry-level display proposition.

The connectivity foundation is largely shared between the two TVs: both offer 3 HDMI 2.1 ports, a single RJ45 ethernet jack, Miracast support, and a 3.5mm audio output — a solid baseline for connecting consoles, soundbars, and streaming sticks. Where the S Pro Mini LED begins to pull ahead is in the finer details of wireless and wired flexibility.

On Wi-Fi, the S Pro adds support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), while the F 2026 tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). In a congested home network with many simultaneous devices, Wi-Fi 6's improved spectrum efficiency and reduced latency can make a tangible difference for 4K streaming stability — especially relevant given the S Pro's higher-refresh-rate panel that benefits from a consistently fast connection. The Bluetooth gap is smaller but still meaningful: Bluetooth 5.2 on the S Pro versus 5.0 on the F 2026 brings modest improvements in connection reliability and audio synchronization, which matters when pairing wireless headphones or speakers.

The S Pro also doubles the USB port count to 2, compared to a single USB on the F 2026 — a practical convenience for users who want to connect a keyboard and a storage drive simultaneously without swapping. Taken together, the S Pro Mini LED 2026 holds a clear connectivity edge, primarily due to Wi-Fi 6 support and the extra USB port, making it the more future-ready option for users building a well-connected living room setup.

Both TVs rely on stereo speaker setups without a subwoofer, and share a strong common codec foundation: Dolby Audio, DTS:X, Digital Out, and full HDMI ARC/eARC support. That last point is worth highlighting — eARC in particular allows high-bandwidth audio formats to pass through to an external soundbar or AV receiver without quality loss, which is increasingly relevant for home theater setups.

The two clearest differentiators are output power and Dolby Atmos support. The S Pro Mini LED steps up to 2 x 15W versus the F 2026's 2 x 10W — a 50% increase in rated power that translates to a louder, more dynamic sound ceiling before the amplifier clips. More significantly, only the S Pro supports Dolby Atmos, the object-based surround format now standard on most premium streaming platforms and Blu-ray releases. Without Atmos decoding, the F 2026 will downmix Atmos tracks to standard stereo, losing the spatial overhead effects that the format is designed to deliver.

The S Pro Mini LED 2026 holds a clear audio advantage here. While neither TV will rival a dedicated soundbar system, the combination of greater output power and Dolby Atmos compatibility gives the S Pro a meaningfully richer built-in audio experience — and better readiness for passthrough to external audio equipment that leverages the full Atmos ecosystem.

Size differences between these two TVs are substantial and intentional — the S Pro Mini LED is a 75″ panel against the F 2026's 65″, so a larger footprint and greater volume are expected. What is worth examining is how that size gap translates into practical installation and handling considerations. At 26.2 kg, the S Pro is almost exactly double the F 2026's 13 kg, which has real implications for wall mounting or repositioning: a two-person installation becomes essentially mandatory for the S Pro, whereas the lighter F 2026 is far more manageable.

Thickness is virtually identical — 73 mm for the S Pro versus 75 mm for the F 2026 — so neither TV has a meaningful slim-profile advantage. Both support VESA mounting, giving users the same flexibility for wall or stand configurations, and both share an identical operating temperature range of 0–40 °C, meaning neither has an environmental resilience edge over the other.

In terms of design specs, there is no clear winner — the comparison is largely driven by the inherent size difference between a 65″ and a 75″ panel. The F 2026 is meaningfully easier to handle and install due to its significantly lower weight, making it the more practical choice for rooms with limited space or for solo installation scenarios. The S Pro's larger dimensions are simply the physical cost of its bigger screen, not a design shortcoming.

For smart platform features, the two TVs are largely equivalent: both offer a built-in smart TV interface, AirPlay, Google Assistant, voice commands, smartphone remote support, USB recording, and the usual convenience tools like sleep timer and child lock. One notable divergence is voice assistant ecosystem breadth — the F 2026 adds Alexa compatibility on top of Google Assistant, while the S Pro supports Google Assistant only. For households already invested in Amazon's smart home ecosystem, this gives the F 2026 a practical edge in daily voice control workflows.

The most consequential difference in this group, however, is power consumption. The S Pro Mini LED draws up to 350W during operation compared to the F 2026's 150W — more than double. This is a direct consequence of its larger screen size and Mini-LED backlighting system, which requires significantly more power to drive its higher brightness output. Over extended daily use, this gap compounds into a meaningful difference in electricity costs. Standby consumption is identical at 0.5W for both, so the delta is purely in active viewing hours.

On balance, the F 2026 65″ holds a narrow but genuine edge in this category. Its Alexa support broadens smart home compatibility, and its substantially lower operating power draw makes it the more energy-efficient choice. The S Pro's higher consumption is an inherent trade-off of its larger, more capable panel rather than a feature deficit, but users who are energy-conscious or deeply embedded in Amazon's ecosystem will find the F 2026 the more accommodating option here.